User talk:Farlack913

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Fila3466757 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

Regarding your edits to Bo'ness railway station:

Your recent edit to Bo'ness railway station (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 16:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But it was my article!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You do not own any article on Wikipedia. Signalhead 17:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Made it!!!!!!!!!!!

Your edits to British Rail Class 314

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to British Rail Class 314. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Signalhead 14:37, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On YouTube,it say that the class 314s are gonna get scrapped!!!!!!!!!! 'I MEAN IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!'''

Please read

Hi, I am writing this in regard to your Edits to dalgety bay railway station...Not only is the information you add Irrelevant and unconstructive you dont spell check and your grammer is terrible...Please stop editing like this as it is seen as vandilisim.... --Djt2k6 20:18, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can spell terrribly well!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND IT IS NOT ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Vandalism warnings

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Addhoc 10:54, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Addhoc 11:10, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'''''''''''''''''''GO AWAY.'''''''''''

Railway station articles

Would you please stop adding incorrect information regarding the number of platforms in use at various railway stations. I don't know what you're using as your information source, or if it is sheer vandalism, but the edits that you have made have been wrong in most cases, possibly in every single case. Signalhead 17:05, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop it now. Signalhead 13:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NO.'

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Manchester Victoria station, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. _└^and-rew_┘^┌_talk^┐ 05:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Manchester Victoria station, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. _└^and-rew_┘^┌_talk<up>┐ 06:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

''''''''''''''''ERM,IT SAYS THAT ON MOST OTHER ARCTICLES!!!!!!!!!!!!!''''''''''''

Lockerbie railway station

Please be aware that you made an inaccurate edit to the article for Lockerbie railway station. This station is one of a small number which is not served by trains on the managing TOC. The reference attached to the operator provides the source of this information. Before you make an edit, please be sure of your source and when in doubt ensure you can provide a citation to your source. --Stewart^(talk) 19:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please desist in making incorrect edits on this article. As is noted in the article (by the reference to the manager in the infobox), and the clarification note I have re-inserted, having been deleted several edits ago, Lockerbie is not managed by the TOC whose trains stop there. --Stewart^(talk) 12:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page message

Your user talk page is a place for others to leave messages. You can't have a message there telling people not to leave messages. Please contact me or any administrator if you need help. Please remove the message. --John (talk) 06:56, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OKAY

MAKE SURE ITS NOT ANYTHING BAD.

I removed it myself. There should never be a reason for anybody to send you anything bad. --John (talk) 01:44, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NO.

NEVER EVER remove a picture from a railway station. It is very annoying. Youre recent removing of images from Ebbsfleet International and Kingsknowe railway stations were Innoproprieat. Please give them a image now.

If you want to leave somebody a message, it's a good idea to put it on their talk page rather than your own. The removal of the images in these instances was entirely appropriate. Please remember to sign your comments by typing ~~~~. Signalhead 16:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Erm...

I dont know who did it! Do not remove images limke that. They were entirely 'Inappropriate'.

You can find out who did it by checking the article's edit history. Most likely, they were removed because the contributor failed to specify an appropriate licence for the images. Don't forget to sign your comments, please. Signalhead 17:47, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Birkhill station

Stop putting near Bo'ness on Birkhill station!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Next tme you do that it shall be reverted into this:

Birkhill,Falkirk (council area).

If you feel the link provided is inappropriate create an article to point to first. In this instance are you denying that Birkhill it not near Bo'ness. Checking the Ordanance Survey map for the area Birkhill appears to be equidistant from Grangemouth, Bo'ness, Polmont and Linlithgow. --Stewart^(talk) 20:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that the Bo'ness article refers to the Birkhill Clay Mine as being in the area, hence the appellation Near Bo'ness is approrpriate. --Stewart^(talk) 21:01, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

Hi. Another editor has asked me to review your edits. I have reverted quite a few of your recent edits as they were factually incorrect. Please discuss in article or project talk if you wish to make further sweeping changes. Could you also remove the message on your user page? It is quite legitimate for others to use your talk page to communicate with you, as I am doing now. Thanks in advance. --John (talk) 16:58, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK THATS IT. IF I GET ANYTHING LIKE THAT I MIGHT REVERT THE EDITS!!!!!!!!!! AND ITS THE STUPID COMPUTER IT DOES NOT ET ME DO ALL LETTERS.LIKE UP THERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Do you need some help? --John (talk) 17:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No.

Very well. I'll lay it on the line for you. Firstly, I have removed your user page message as it was inappropriate and contravened our policies. Second, stop being rude to people here. Third, please be a lot more careful with your edits. Fourth, there is no shame in asking for help; if you ever decide you need help, just type {{helpme}} on this page and someone will help you. Best wishes, --John (talk) 17:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Salisbury railway station

One thing..........

I am unhappy with your removing of the image of Salisbury railway station. It was extremley inapropereat.

Next time, check out why the image has been removed and if you feel it should be there, be BOLD and re-instate your self.

Please post a message on the appropriate talk page (User concerned or relevant article). Your message here is not likely to be seen by the editor how removed the image, and posting the way you did inferred that your previous correspondent was responsible. --Stewart^(talk) 19:43, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Fila3466757 for evidence. Jehochman ^Talk 22:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]