User talk:Farabay
October 2014
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sea in culture may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:23, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Sea in culture to GA?
[edit]Thanks for your help on Sea in culture. I think, looking back at the article, that it's about ready for submission to GAN. Would you fancy giving me a hand shepherding it through to GA? Given that the article is well cited, it shouldn't be too much of a problem. (BTW I think I've already fixed your BracketBot issue above...) All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:20, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Sure, let me know what needs to be done.
- Great. I'll put the article in the GA queue - we may have a wait of weeks or months; please take a look at the article to check it for balance, things we've missed, and any claims that aren't justified by the evidence. I think it's pretty solid, specially from a European perspective; no doubt the coverage of maritime culture from faraway regions could be improved. Looking at the article now, I wonder if your additions rather unbalance the literature section even further towards Europe, and especially Britain? A reviewer might well pick us up on this. Either we should cut this down, or we should add more on literature from other seas. I'll do a little copy-editing to tone the bias down a little.
- BTW, I know it's a ridiculous thing, but why don't you fix the redlink for your username by putting something on your user page? Reviewers automatically assume you're a more serious editor if you have a bluelink. I said it was ridiculous... but maybe worth doing. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:19, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 28
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- John Gower
- added a link pointing to Speculum
- Southwark Cathedral
- added a link pointing to Speculum
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
A page you started (Sebastian Sobecki) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Sebastian Sobecki, Farabay!
Wikipedia editor K.e.coffman just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thank you for improving coverage of academics on Wikipedia.
To reply, leave a comment on K.e.coffman's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
K.e.coffman (talk) 17:12, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Interest in Sebastian Sobecki
[edit]Hello! I saw your recent edit to Geoffrey Chaucer and looking through your edit history I noticed that you have relatively few edits and that many of them (if not most) relate to Sebastian Sobecki’s research. It looks like you also created the page on Mr Sobecki. I greatly respect Mr Sobecki's research, and he is a respected figure in the field of academic medievalism. But having said that, I encourage you to disclose any wp:conflict of interest that might relate to your contributions. If I am mistaken and you are just an avid reader of Mr Sobecki's research, I apologise, but I also hope you understand my concern. While it’s fine to cite one’s own research within reason, disclosing conflicts of interest is essential to maintaining the neutrality of our project. CoatGuy2 (talk) 04:45, 4 November 2022 (UTC)