User talk:Fallywaky

Welcome!

Hello, Fallywaky, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 18:39, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

low watch areas

please understand that southeast asia generic articles have few if any watchers - and when offering comment - please learn to sign WP:SIGN - thanks JarrahTree 01:13, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moves

Please stop moving around articles, and instead discuss them at WP:RM, as the changes/moves appear to be against consensus as Paul 012 mentioned here. Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:19, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern but, we did have a discussion and found a majority amount of support for the name change. You must not of read the whole discussion board.Fallywaky (talk) 19:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC) https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Indochina_(Indo-China)Fallywaky (talk) 19:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Having read that discussion, please start a formal requested move - considering how many titles these articles have apparently gone through, this needs to be done properly - there's no urgency here, and in 7-14 days the requested move should resolve things properly. Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:28, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And stop move-warring - once someone reverts a move you make, you should start an RM rather than revert them again. Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The title was also changed in 2015 without a consensus or formal discussion

Yes, meaning it is even more important that things are done correctly this time; the closer of the discussion will take that into account. Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay will doFallywaky (talk) 19:34, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Current title of page 2

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Current title of page 2, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 19:45, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider

You could get blocked if you keep doing moves without adequate consultation. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia WP:ABOUT and WP:NOT - not a blog or website where you run with an idea and implement changes on the spot, or after one other person leaves a comment, maybe two.

Most WP:RM actually require considerable patience, and in fact some respect for others points of view, and also adequate understanding of what WP:RS are required to substaniate an argument, and also understanding that other editors actually have a place in being able to present a reasonable argument, with clarifications of usages and in your case - a very better understanding of process.

Also try to understand that WP:COMMONNAME and also WP:IDONTLIKEIT look like some items you should become aware of if you wish to continue editing. JarrahTree 06:52, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fallywaky. Thank you. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 17:07, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fallywaky. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 14:15, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]