User talk:Faiyaz Khalid

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khalidatwiki, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

McGeddon (talk) 18:33, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Faiyaz Khalid

A tag has been placed on User:Faiyaz Khalid, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. McGeddon (talk) 18:33, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Khalidatwiki (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. JohnCD (talk) 18:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good Afternoon

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Faiyaz Khalid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear JohnCD I am a new editor recently joined wikipedia to contribute Articles. I am a multilingual editor as well as a lawyer so i am absolute obedient toward law and policy but unfortunately i was unaware of wikipedia policies. Having multiple account caused my account blocked permanently now i am unable to even edit my own page. I have no option for being a user other than creating a new Account with different name as well as with different server but i wont to use another name as my user name. This user name is my name and an authentic name so kindly unblock me. i take oth in front of wikipedia that i will not violate any policy further and will serve wikipedia without violating any policy. I hope administration will give a last opportunity to serve wikipedia. Faiyaz Khalid (talk) 08:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nope, you can't write about yourself here. Especially not after your previous accounts were blocked. Max Semenik (talk) 11:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Faiyaz Khalid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have gone through the wikipedia policies and special attention is paid to each sections. Kindly give me last opportunity to edit the incomplete and pending pages

Decline reason:

If you are talking about editing pages about yourself, or about adding yourself to other pages, the answer is no. If you refer to other things that are 'incomplete and pending', please tell us what they are, and about any other editing you may have in mind. Peridon (talk) 17:38, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Looking at the sockpuppet investigation, it looks to me as if all you have been doing, using multiple accounts, is creating articles about yourself (which are not warranted in an encyclopedia as you are not notable by WP:N standards), using your user page to host writings about yourself, and even inserting links from encyclopedia pages to your user page. If you want to be unblocked and allowed to edit Wikipedia, I suggest you need to explain in clear terms why all of that was wrong (just claiming that you understand the rules is probably not sufficient, so I think you would need to show that you understand). Also, you would improve your chances if you explained what you would do to help develop the project if allowed back. 823510731 (talk) 16:32, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]