User talk:FaithinHim

Gary Portnoy

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - His birth information was correct. Please do not remove such information. Langara College 21:55, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Portnoy

Is there a reason why you keep adding a link to Gary Portnoy's home page to all the shows he was involved with? Surely one link on his article page is enough. Have a look through WP:EL when you get a chance. Orpheus 07:43, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am curious about this as well. It isn't so much that they were added (we all have done things that others did not agree with or were wrong here) but that you keep readding them when others keep removing them. To sum up the part of the article most relevant to this issue: "WP:EL#Links normally to be avoided: Sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject". If the subject is about a televsion show, then external links directly related to the show are the only ones that should be included. If that link is alowed as an external in a TV article, then the official website of every other person involved in creating one of the TV shows from the producer to the grips also belong in that show's external links, but what sense would that make? There's more to it than just populating articles with links and information. — CobraWiki ^{( jabber | stuff )} 08:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gary Portnoy Destiny.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gary Portnoy Destiny.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gary Portnoy Destiny.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gary Portnoy Destiny.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Gary Portnoy Destiny.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Gary Portnoy Destiny.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 17:55, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where Everybody Knows Your Name

Why adding back something that plays the old song? --George Ho (talk) 01:20, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This page is not about "Cheers". It is about the THEME FROM CHEERS. So it is definitely relevant and IMPORTANT- and also interesting!- to show that the theme has had a life of its own separate and apart from the TV Series Cheers. And that means showing how it has woven its way into the fabric of American culture. And being used on other TV shows is part of that. As well as being recorded by other artists and used in movies and advertising campaigns. It is all part of "The Cheers Theme On Its Own". That is much more all encompassing than "Covers"- which is too "narrow" a category. FaithinHim (talk) 04:51, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Interesting" is not a reason. We care about quality of article. Is there any other song articles that mention playing original versions in other materials? --George Ho (talk) 05:11, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Please discuss there. --George Ho (talk) 05:15, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi- I thought we were respectfully "discussing"- not "warring". I am certainly not warring with you. Perhaps "interesting" was not my best choice of words. But I stand behind "relevant" and "important". As per your request, here are some articles and other documentation in support of "broadening" this page, rather than "narrowing" it.

http://www.sportsgrid.com/mlb/brewers-play-cheers-theme-song-boston-marathon-tragedy/ http://tv.yahoo.com/news/how-gary-portnoy-made--cheers--the-place--where-everybody-knows-your-name---230349578.html?.tsrc=_news&page=1 http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2013/04/16/supreme-themes-60-greatest-title-songs-all-time/ http://adventuretime.wikia.com/wiki/Simon_%26_Marcy http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Dr_Pepper (in “Marketing” section) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0scT-HAR9g http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Swarley (at the end of “Plot” section) http://rapgenius.com/Ll-cool-j-clap-your-hands-lyrics (cheers theme in lyrics) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0blcN01ENk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdt79SBoG6g http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzLi6Oc5jvQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKhP3PnB_xM http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0583566/plotsummary?ref_=tt_ov_pl http://www.thewildhearts.com/discography/cheers/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfN1E5pSWwA (last ten seconds of clip) http://www.celebritynetworth.com/articles/entertainment-articles/interview-gary-portnoy-cheers-theme-song-writer/ http://www.artistdirect.com/nad/window/media/page/0,,888680-3209786,00.html (the wedding present) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB8oNAZkpqQ (bill nye the science guy)FaithinHim (talk) 16:25, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to include performances of a same version. No other pages do that today, unless you can counter that with an example. As for the 3RR issue, the report went stale and was archived without result. The rule says I must do no more than three reverts within 24 hours, so I hope you do the same. --George Ho (talk) 22:57, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

      Hi, George

      On the Wikipedia page for "Sweet Caroline", they include the very same example that I have been trying to include on the Cheers theme page.   They mention that "Sweet Caroline" (the original version!!!) was played at various major league ballparks to show solidarity with the poeple of Boston in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombings.  So I hope you will consider allowing me to include the same information on this page-  no more and no less.  That seems only fair.  Here is an excerpt from the "Sweet Caroline" page-            "On April 16, 2013, the day after the Boston Marathon bombings, the New York Yankees—longtime Red Sox rivals—announced they would play the song during their home game, preceded by a moment of silence, as a tribute to the victims.[8] The song was sung out at sporting events across the country after the Boston Marathon bombings, in efforts to show solidarity with those affected by the tragedy. It was also played right before the start of the Hamburg Marathon in Hamburg, Germany, on Sunday, April 21, 2013, subsequent to a minute of silence.[9]FaithinHim (talk) 03:16, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Where Everybody Knows Your Name, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scrubs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Where Everybody Knows Your Name, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scrubs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict on interest

Hello, FaithinHim. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Gary Portnoy, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 15:07, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, FaithinHim. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello FaithinHim, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Where Everybody Knows Your Name have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:57, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]