User talk:Fair Galaxy

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Fair Galaxy, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Abigail Hopkins seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RhinosF1 (talk) 18:17, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Abigail Hopkins, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. RhinosF1 (talk) 18:32, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Fair Galaxy. You have new messages at RhinosF1's talk page.
Message added 18:45, 18 January 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

RhinosF1 (talk) 18:45, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice about sources This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Take extra care to use high-quality sources. Material about living persons should not be added when the only sourcing is tabloid journalism; see more information on sources. Never use self-published sources about a living person unless written or published by the subject; see WP:BLPSPS and WP:BLPSELFPUB.

Talkback

Hello, Fair Galaxy. You have new messages at RhinosF1's talk page.
Message added 19:11, 18 January 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

RhinosF1 (talk) 19:11, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. RhinosF1 (talk) 19:36, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some proposed changes

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined.

Information to be added or removed: After her father reportedly walked out on her as a toddler, they briefly reconciled in the 1990s. Abigail has been estranged from her father for several decades.[3] This information needs to be removed as it is effectively "lifting" information from tabloids. The statement saying estranged for several decades is not backed up by factual sources. Explanation of issue: the above article by RhinosF1 does not adhere to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View nor does it follow guidelines regarding "Living Persons" when most of the article refers to history covered by tabloid articles. References supporting change: ADD URL AT LEAST Fair Galaxy (talk) 19:51, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Talk:Abigail Hopkins

RhinosF1 (talk) 19:58, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Refused - User:Spintendo has given a WP:3O and decided to keep the content. RhinosF1 (talk) 07:30, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Fair_Galaxy reported by User:RhinosF1 (Result: ). Thank you. RhinosF1 (talk) 21:34, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Abigail Hopkins. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:46, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Fair Galaxy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23784 was submitted on Jan 19, 2019 13:27:21. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 13:27, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fair Galaxy, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

RhinosF1 (talk) 07:51, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fair Galaxy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:16, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]