User talk:Fahmi hamzah21
Welcome!
Hello, Fahmi hamzah21, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! EricSerge (talk) 02:14, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
There is a valid text of Allopanishad cited in Shabda-Kalpadrum of Radha Kanta Deva. Pandit Radhakrishna of Lahore, Maharaja Madanamohana of Vishnupura, Pandit Vittala Sastri of Kashi, all of them have agreed with the authenticity.
According to Rajendralala Mitra, Bábu Harischandra of Benares has a manuscript that bears the titled of “Allā-Upaniṣad,” and it professes to be a chapter of the Pippaláda Sákhá of the Atharva Veda.
Pujya Sri Nath Bhagwan (Mahatma Sri Nathuram Sharma) of Bilkha near Junagadh, Saurashtra (Gujarat) has translated the 108 Upanishads in Gujarati. In his collection of 108 Upanishads, there exists an Upanishad named Allopanishad.
Mahatma Gandhi, Ved Prakash Upadhyaya, Sri Harimohan Bandhopadhyaya, Upendra Nath Mukhopadhyaya, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar and Sri Vāstava, they all have agreed with the authenticity of Allopanishad.
Written in Radhakanta Deb’s Shabda-Kalpadrum and Vāchaspatya of Pandit Tārānātha Tarkavācaspati Bhattācārya, that Allopanisad is in the First Hymn of Paippalādasaṃhitā of the Atharvaveda, and it is a well-known Vedic hymn.
All texts of Allopanisad that make it considering as an apocrypha is come from the text of Swami Dayanand Saraswati's Satyarth Prakash, whereas no one can refuse the authority of Allopanishad that cited in Shabda-Kalpadrum.
Mathuradas Trikumji in his later to Mahatma Gandhi says that Allopanisad is from the time of Atharvaveda (circa 1000 BC). R. Ananthakrishna Sastri in his article on the Theosophist, volume 19, Madras 1898, gives a statement that Allopanishad does not appear in the characterictic style of ordinary Upanishads. It was written in the style of old Rigveda verses.
Friedrich Otto Schrader in “A Descriptive Catalogue of the Sanskrit Manuscripts in the Adyar Library Vol. I. Upanisads”, page 136, states that some years ago, a palm-leaf MS of Allopaniṣad was in the Adyar Library, but it was rejected by the then librarian. In the North India according to Schrader, Allopaniṣad is not only reckoned to the Atharvaveda, but actually recited by the Brahmins at the Vasantotsava or any occasion when selected texts of the four Vedas have to be read in the house of a Dvija.
Written in “Vol 94 of The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi”, page 234, Mahātmā Gāndhī said: “But no one who belongs to Hinduism can have reason to complain. We have 108 Upanishads. One of them is the Allopanishad.”
Even though, Swami Vivekananda believes that Allopaniṣad must be a modern creation and not genuine, but in the book “From Colombo to Almora” published by Vyjayanti Press Madras in 1897, there is a statement in its Glossary that Allopaniṣad is one of the 108 Upanishads.
Allah Sūkta is written in situs “www.veda.harekrsna.cz/encyclopedia/upanisads.htm”: Ācamana vedānta, Āzrama, advaita vedānta, alla zakta (Allopaniṣad), Ārseya vedānta, Ātharvan-advitīya zakta, and so forth.
Allopaniṣad has been reproduced by the founder of Arya Samaj Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati in his book “Satyarthaprakash” 2nd revised edition published in Vikram Samvat 1939 i.e. 1882 AD. But, we can find the inconsistency between the text of Allopaniṣad in “Satyarthaprakash” published by Srimati Paropakarini Sabha, Ajmer 1983 Edition and the text of Allopaniṣad in “An English translation of the Satyarthaprakash” (1908) published by Virganand Press Lahore.
As we know, those who oppose the authority of Allopaniṣad, like Rajendralala Mitra and Sri Aurobindo; and those who reproduced the text of Allopaniṣad in modern era, like Nagendra Nath Vasu and Bhojraj Dwivedi; they based their opinion from Dayanand Saraswati’s statement only and on his version of Allopaniṣad, while we know that we can see the inconsistency among the texts of Allopaniṣad that are reproduced from Satyarthaprakash’s version till now. And, Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati himself just make an opinion about the falseness of Allopaniṣad with disapprove of his predecessors like Rādhā Kānta Deva, Tārānātha Tarkavācaspati Bhattācārya, Raja Vijayagovinda Sinha from Purnia, Maharaja Madanamohana from Vishnupura, Pandit Radhakrishna from the court of Maharaja Ranajita Sinha, and Pandit Vitthala Sastri from “Benares College”, who have agreed about the authority of Allopaniṣad on Shabda-Kalpadrum. So, the text of Allopaniṣad written in Rādhā Kānta Deva’s Shabda-Kalpadrum is the most authentic version among the other versions because it has gotten many testimonies from many prominent scholars around the world.
According to ‘Abdu-’l-Qādir Ibn-i-Mulūk Shāh (al-Badāoni) in his most celebrated work “The Muntakhabu-’rūkh”, page 213-214, the Atharva Veda translated from Sanskrit into Persian at 1575-76 A.D./A.H. 983 by Hājī Ibrāhīm Sirhindī, it has a passage that contains many times the letter l (full of geminate or double consonant l), and many precepts in the ancient Hindu scripture are similar to Islam. But, the manuscript of that work is not preserved, it is now lost to us.
The passage in the Atharva Veda which contains many times the letter l is known as Allopaniṣad (Allā-Upaniṣad) or Allaḥ Sūkta. According to Pandit Tārānātha Tarkavācaspati Bhattācārya in his great lexicon “Vāchaspatya” and Raja Rādhā Kānta Deva Bahadur in his famous dictionary “Shabda-Kalpadrum”, Allopaniṣad (Allā-Upaniṣad) or Allaḥ Sūkta is Ādi Sūkta (First/Chief Hymn), a celebrated Vedic Hymn.
J.N. Bhattācārya and Nilanjana Sarkar in their “Encyclopedia Dictionary of Sanskrit Literature” give a testimony that Allopaniṣad is a celebrated work of Sanskrit literature.
Purushottam Nagesh Oak in his “Some blunders of Indian historical research”, page 305, writes that Allopaniṣad is a Hindu Upanishad.
Yakos Marvin in his “Jesus, Jews and Jihad”, page 91, writes that Allopaniṣad is one of the ancient Sanskrit literatures.
As the Īsopaniṣad, Allopaniṣad (Allā-Upaniṣad) or Allaḥ Sūkta is actually a part of Saṁhitā. The fact can be drawn from the Atharvaveda Śaunakīya Śākhā, where in it there is a hymn named “Idā/Ilā/Allā-Sūkta”, the one and only Vedic Hymn in Śaunakīya Saṁhitā that praising the name of Idā/Ilā/Allā in a single hymn. Not only that, there is a fact in Vaitāyana (Yajñaprāyaścitta-sūtra or Atharvavedaprāyaścittāni), in which that it has proximity to the 5th Mantra of Allopaniṣad.
Moreover, it is fact that the style of writing in Gopātha Brāhmana is similar to the style of writing in Allopaniṣad because they are full of geminate or double consonant.
The feature of geminate in Allopaniṣad is found in the literature of Kashmirian Śaivisme also, that is, Stavacintāmaṇi composed by Bhaṭṭa Nārāyaṇa (Mrgarajalaksman). And, the name of Allā truly exists on the 47th Sūtra of the 120 Sūtras in Stavacintāmaṇi:
rāgo 'py astu jagannātha mama tvayy eva yaḥ sthitaḥ /
lobhāyāpi namas tasmai tvallābhālambanāya me //
Conjunct Consonant in Old Indo-Aryan is absorbed in Middle Indo-Aryan and long vowel antecedence turning into short vowel. In the region between Panjabi and western Hindi, the feature of Indo-Aryan is long vowel turns into short vowel when precedes geminate and the double consonant is permanent. The region between Panjabi and western Hindi actually is the Delhi Doab, a region between the Sutlej river and the Yamuna river. The feature of Conjunct Consonant in Old Indo-Aryan is preserved in the first Mantra of Allopaniṣad, i.e., asmallāṁ (asma + allā → asmallāṁ, asma is from “a-sma”, a pronominal base, also the base of the first person plural that showing ‘possessive case’; allāṁ is ‘accusative case’ of the feminine noun allā).
Nagendra Nath Vasu in his “Hindi Vishva Kosh”, second volume, states that Allopaniṣad is a sūkta (hymn) that praising Parameśvara and Allā/Allaḥ is the name of Parameśvara or Brahmā.
According to Śrī Śrī Ravi Shankar, Allopaniṣad is a separate Upanishad.
And, Allopaniṣad is one of the Atharvan texts available today. Similar to the Puruśa Sūkta of the Atharvaveda Jājalā Śākhā (solitary, accented manuscript at Baroda) as the one and only hymn of Jājalā Samhitā that exists in our era; similar to Nīlarudrasūkta as a sūkta (hymn) of the Atharvaveda Paippalāda Śākhā and exist not in Śaunakīya Saṁhitā, but Nīlarudrasūkta gets testimony from the 49th Atharvaveda Pariśiṣṭa (Caraṇavyūha) as an Upanisad (Nīlarudra Upaniṣad or Nīlarudropaniṣad). Nīlarudra Upaniṣad (Nilārudropaniṣad) of Paippalāda Saṁhitā is mentioned on Caraṇavyūha and Dīpikā only, but mentioned not on Muktikā Upaniṣad (Muktikopaniṣad); and Allā-Upaniṣad or Allopaniṣad also does exist out from Muktikopaniṣad, Caraṇavyūha, and Dīpikā.
Atharvaveda Saṁhitā has two survived recensions in our era, that are, Śaunakīya Saṁhitā and Paippalāda Saṁhitā. Paippalāda Saṁhitā is believed as the representative version of the Atharvaveda in the past. It has two manuscripts that are survived, i.e., palm leaf manuscripts in the Oriya script and one Śāradā manuscript. Till nowadays, the palm leaf manuscripts in the Oriya script are the complete version of the Atharvaveda Paippalāda Śākhā (AVP), while the Śāradā manuscript of the AVP is abnormally defective and mutilated. And the mutilated birch-bark manuscript of the Paippalāda Saṁhitā in the Śāradā script now lies in Tubingen University (Germany).
Though the initial part of the Śāradā manuscript (Kashmirian Atharvaveda) was destroyed, the “Kashmirian Atharvaveda” perhaps containing the earliest and the best version of the Atharvaveda.
The palm leaf manuscripts in the Oriya script of the AVP is the long version, variances with the “Kashmirian Atharvaveda”. There are 923 Kāṇḍikā and 7899 Mantra in Paippalāda Saṁhitā according to the palm leaf manuscripts in the Oriya script of the AVP, while there are 825 Kāṇḍikā and 7192 Mantra in Paippalāda Saṁhitā according to the mutilated birch-bark manuscript of the Paippalāda Saṁhitā in the Śāradā script.
Viśva Bandhu Śāstri has mentioned 200 Upanishads in his “Vaidika Padānukrama Kośa” (Lahore edition, 1945). In these 200 Upanishads, “Allāh Upaniṣad” (Allaḥ Sūkta or Allopaniṣad) is mentioned on the 12th position.
The Kalyan Magazine, the 23rd edition, published in 1949 by Gita Press of Gorakhpur has mentioned 220 Upanishads in its special issue named “Upanishad-Ank”; and Allopaniṣad is mentioned on the 15th position.
Allopaniṣad is mentioned in “Upanisatsamgraha” or ‘The List of 188 Upanishads’, page 392-93, published in 1970 by Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited in New Delhi.
Allopaniṣad has been reproduced by the founder of Arya Samaj Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati in his book “Satyarthaprakash” 2nd revised edition published in Vikram Samvat 1939 i.e. 1882 AD. But, we can find the inconsistency between the text of Allopaniṣad in “Satyarthaprakash” published by Srimati Paropakarini Sabha, Ajmer 1983 Edition and the text of Allopaniṣad in “An English translation of the Satyarthaprakash” (1908) published by Virganand Press Lahore. And, those who oppose the authority of Allopaniṣad, like Rajendralala Mitra and Sri Aurobindo; and those who reproduced the text of Allopaniṣad in modern era, like Nagendra Nath Vasu and Bhojraj Dwivedi; they based their opinion from Dayanand Saraswati’s statement only and on his version of Allopaniṣad, while there is the inconsistency among the texts of Allopaniṣad that are reproduced from Satyarthaprakash’s version till now.
Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati himself just make an opinion about the falseness of Allopaniṣad with disapprove of his predecessors like Rādhā Kānta Deva, Tārānātha Tarkavācaspati Bhattācārya, Raja Vijayagovinda Sinha from Purnia, Maharaja Madanamohana from Vishnupura, Pandit Radhakrishna from the court of Maharaja Ranajita Sinha, and Pandit Vitthala Sastri from “Benares College”, who have agreed about the authority of Allopaniṣad on Shabda-Kalpadrum.
Bibliography
Turner, Patricia and Coulter, C. R. 2000. Dictionary of Ancient Deities. USA: McFarland.
Cappeller, Carl. 1891. A Sanskrit-English Dictionary Based Upon the St. Petersburg Lexicons. USA: Ginn and Company.
Bhattacharyya, Durgamohan. 1964. Paippalādasaṃhitā of the Atharvaveda (Kāṇḍa 1). Calcutta: Sanskrit College.
Vasu, Ś. C. The Ashtadhyayi of Panini (Book VII)–Translated into English. 1897. Benares: Sindhu Charan Bose.
Apte, V. S. 1957. The Practical Sanskrit-English Dictionary (1st ed.). Poona: Prasad Prakashan.
. 1965. The Practical Sanskrit-English Dictionary (Fourth Revised & Enlarged Edition). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Kijne, I. S. 2008. Mazmur dan Nyanyian Rohani dari Perbendaharaan Jemaat Segala Abad (Cetakan ke-94). Jakarta: Gunung Mulia.
Yamuger. 2000. Kidung Jemaat (Cetakan ke-40). Jakarta: Yayasan Musik Gereja.
Witzel, Michael. 1997. The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools. Cambridge: Harvard Oriental Series.
Goswami, B. B. 1978. Atharvaveda-samhita. In: Sanskrit with Bengali script and translation. Calcutta: Haraf Prakashani Publishers.
Macdonell, A. A. 1893. A Sanskrit-English Dictionary. London: Longmans, Green, And Co.
Benfey, Theodore. 1866. A Sanskrit-English Dictionary. London: Longmans, Green, And Co.
Monier-Williams, Monier. 1899. A Sanskrit-English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Whitney, W. D. 1856. Contributions from the Atharva-Veda to the Theory of Sanskrit Verbal Accent. Journal of the American Oriental Society, V: 387-419.
. 1879. A Sanskrit Grammar. London: Trubner & Co.
Gaud, R. S. (Ed.). 1990. Atharvaveda with Sāyanabhāṣya. Varanasi: Chowkhamba Vidyabhavan.
Desai, S. G. 1996. A Critical Study of the Later Upanishads. Delhi: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan
Sharma, Suresh K. and Sharma, Usha (Eds.). 2004. Cultural and Religious Heritage of India (1st ed.). New Delhi: Mittal Publications.
Sharma, Shubhra. 1985. Life in the Upanishads. New Delhi: Abhinav Publications.
Bloomfield, Maurice. 1899. The Atharvaveda. Strassburg: K. J. Trubner.
. 1906. A Vedic Concordance. Massachusetts: Harvard University.
Prasad, Durga (Ed.). 1908. An English Translation of the Satyarth Prakash of Maharshi Swami Dayanand Saraswati. Lahore: Virjanand Press.
Singh, Nagendra KR (Ed.). 2000. Encyclopedia of Hinduism (1st ed.). New Delhi: Anmol Publications.
Kaw, M.K. (Ed.). 2004. Kashmir & Its People. New Delhi: S. B. Nangia.
Hopkins, E. W. 1895. The Religion of India. USA: Ginn & Company, Publishers.
Brewer, E. C. 1894. Dictionary of Phrase and Fable (New and Enlarged Edition). London: Cassell and Company, Limited.
The Editors of the Raja’s Sabdakalpadruma. 1859. A Rapid Sketch of the Life of Raja Radhakanta Deva Bahadur. Calcutta: Englishman Press.
Lees, Captan W. N. and Ali, Munshi Ahmad (Eds.). 1865. The Muntakhab Al-Tawārīkh of Abd Al-Qādir bin- I Malūk Shah Al-Badāoni. Calcutta: College Press.
Elliot, Henry M. 1850. Bibliographical Index to the Historians of Muhammedan India (Vol. I). Calcutta: Baptist Mission Press.
Jarrett, H. S. 1948. Bibliotheca Indica. An English Translation of ‘Ain-I-Ākbari of Abul Fazl-I-‘Āllami (Vol. III). Calcutta: Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal.
Witzel, Michael. 1995. Early Indian history: linguistic and textual parameters, in: George Erdosy, The Indo-Aryans of ancient South Asia. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
Böhtlingk, Otto. 1847. Vopadeva’s Mugdhabodha. St. Petersburg: Eggers et Comp.
The Mugdhabodha: A Sanscrit Grammar, by Vopadeva. 1820. Calcutta: Sanscrit College
Aiyar, K. N. 1914. Thirty Minor Upanishads (English Translation). Madras: Theosophical Society.
Weber, Albrecht. 1850. Indische Studien. Berlin: Trowitzsch und Sohn.
. 1852. Indische Literaturgeschichte. Berlin: Akademische Vorlesungen.
. 1869. Indische Streifen. Berlin: A. Effert und L. Lindtner.
Griffiths, Arlo and Schmiedchen, Annette (Eds.). 2007. The Atharvaveda and its Paippalādaśākhā, Historical and Philological Papers on A Vedic Tradition. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.
Sadhale, G. Shastri. 1940. Upanishad vakya Mahakosha. Bombay: Gujarati Printing Press.
Sarkar, Jadunath. 1919. Studies in Mughal India. Calcutta: M. C. Sarkar & Sons.
Chand, Tara. 1922. Influence of Islam on Indian Culture. Allahabad: Indian Press.
Barnett, L. D. 1994. Antiquities of India. New Delhi: J. Jetley
Mishra, V. B. 1973. Religious Beliefs and Practices of North India during the Early Mediaeval Period. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Sonawane, V. H. …. Harappan Civilization in Western India with Special Reference to Gujarat. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 1 (2): 63-78.
Bryant, E. F. and Patton, L. L. 2005. The Indo-Aryan Controversy. Oxon: Routledge.
www.astroveda.wikidot.com/vedic-agni-illa
Sachau, E. C. 1910. Alberuni’s India. An Account of the Religion, Philosophy, Literature, Geography, Chronology, Astronomy, Customs, Laws and Astrology of India about A.D. 1030. An English Edition, with Notes and Indices. In Two Volumes, Vol. I. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & CO.
Sarup, Lakshman. 1967. The Nighantu and the Nirukta: Text and Translation (Second Reprint). New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited.
University of Madras. 1924. Tamil lexicon. Madras: University of Madras.
Deva, Radha Kanta. 1967. Shabda-Kalpadrum. Third Edition (Part One). Varanasi: The Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.
Tarkavachaspati, Taranatha. 1873. Vachaspatya–A Comprehensive Sanscrit Dictionary (Part. I). Calcutta: Kavya Prakasha Press.
Schrader, F. Otto. 1908. A Descriptive Catalogue of the Sanskrit Manuscripts in the Adyar Library Vol. I. Upanisads. Madras: Oriental Publishing Co., LTD.
Caturvedi, Mahendra. 1970. A Practical Hindi-English Dictionary. Delhi: National Publishing House.
http://www.indiadivine.org/audarya/advaita-vedanta/531084-radha-ji.html
Mitra, Sudipta. 2005. Gir Forest and the Saga of the Asiatic Lion. New Delhi: Indus Publishing Company.
Dasgupta, Surendranath. 1952. A History of Indian Philosophy. London: The Syndic of The Cambridge University Press.
Apte, Vaman Shivaram. Revised and enlarged edition of Prin. V. S. Apte's The practical Sanskrit-English dictionary. Poona: Prasad Prakashan, 1957-1959. 3v. Dasa, Syamasundara. Hindi sabdasagara. Navina samskarana. Kasi: Nagari Pracarini Sabha, 1965-1975.
September 2011
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Allopanishad has been reverted.
Your edit here to Allopanishad was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.astroveda.wikidot.com/vedic-agni-illa) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:30, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Your contributed article, The Another Facts about Allopanishad
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, The Another Facts about Allopanishad. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Allopanishad. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Allopanishad - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. EricSerge (talk) 02:09, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Image tagging for File:Allā-Upaniṣad-1000px.jpeg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Allā-Upaniṣad-1000px.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:06, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Your contributed article, A Sukta of Atharvaveda cited in Shabda-Kalpadrum
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, A Sukta of Atharvaveda cited in Shabda-Kalpadrum. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Allaḥ Sūkta. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Allaḥ Sūkta - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. —Torchiest talkedits 19:05, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of A Sukta of Atharvaveda cited in Shabda-Kalpadrum for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Sukta of Atharvaveda cited in Shabda-Kalpadrum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Sukta of Atharvaveda cited in Shabda-Kalpadrum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Torchiest talkedits 22:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:The List of 200 Upanishads in "Vaidika-Padanukrama-Kosa".pdf
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:The List of 200 Upanishads in "Vaidika-Padanukrama-Kosa".pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Reticulated Spline (t • c) 00:07, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of File:Allā-Upaniṣad in Satyarth Prakash.pdf
[edit]A file that you uploaded, File:Allā-Upaniṣad in Satyarth Prakash.pdf, has been listed in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion because it is not an image, sound or video file and does not appear to have any encyclopedic use. See section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you feel that this file has a use in the encyclopedia, please place the {{hangon}} tag on File:Allā-Upaniṣad in Satyarth Prakash.pdf, then go to its talk page (by clicking Discussion at the top of that page) and insert an explanation of how the file is useful to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:58, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of File:Allā-Upaniṣad.pdf
[edit]A file that you uploaded, File:Allā-Upaniṣad.pdf, has been listed in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion because it is not an image, sound or video file and does not appear to have any encyclopedic use. See section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you feel that this file has a use in the encyclopedia, please place the {{hangon}} tag on File:Allā-Upaniṣad.pdf, then go to its talk page (by clicking Discussion at the top of that page) and insert an explanation of how the file is useful to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:58, 3 May 2016 (UTC)