User talk:Fahad15151GO

Warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:56, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Abbasid Caliphate‎, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Eperoton (talk) 19:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Pan-Arabism

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Pan-Arabism without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 12:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Aniran, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yintan 11:55, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 18:15, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Two Centuries of Silence— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 19:01, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Baba Ishak. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 18:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sultanate of Rum. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Psychology, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 17:35, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Arab Jews has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Arab Jews was changed by Fahad15151GO (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907634 on 2016-12-06T14:42:43+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Arab Jews, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 14:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]