User talk:Factman67

March 2018

Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to SuperSport (South African TV channel) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 17:39, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at SuperSport (South African TV channel). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dolotta (talk) 17:47, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Marius van der Westhuizen. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dolotta (talk) 17:49, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dumbasses

You idiots Factman67 (talk) 17:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Dolotta. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. —RainFall 17:57, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion

I was just stating the fact that they had made an incorrect decision and expressed it in an emotive manner. This is bullying on your part Factman67 (talk) 18:00, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 1992 Troy State vs. DeVry men's basketball game, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Please see its talk page for many previous rejected edit requests to change the score. Until the NCAA formally recognizes the game as 253–141, it remains 258–141. SportsGuy789 (talk) 06:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you have to be so stuck up, you think you're something special just cause you go around undoing other people's edits on Wikipedia, literally the only people who that page are people who watched Jon Bois's video. So maybe get over yourself and go play a sport for real Factman67 (talk) 07:55, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. SportsGuy789 (talk) 15:36, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm engaged in a dispute with you, you're so desperate to be relevant you didn't even read the above. Factman67 (talk) 20:33, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will not respond to silly name calling and accusations nor were you were engaging in a constructive manner. You had been initially warned about disruptive editing to an article where the consensus is to leave the final score as 258–141. After the warning, you went and made the same disruptive edits again (one might say that "you didn't even read the above"). Please discontinue making those changes to the article; further disruptive editing can potentially result in a block. Thank you. SportsGuy789 (talk) 20:50, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've only gotten one warning about disruptive editing and i haven't done anything since. Maybe stop trying to be a smart ass in your responses and do something better with your life rather than being the person who is so up their own as that they keep checking edits on an insignificant Wikipedia page. Factman67 (talk) 21:44, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The discussion can be found here. SportsGuy789 (talk) 22:17, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Johnuniq (talk) 23:25, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you both have assumed my gender which is a violation of my rights. Secondly this is so petty, you're upset because i told you should do something better with your life than being a person undos other people's edits. The edits i made on Troy vs Devry were not vandalism as i truly believe that the correct score should be displayed and your logic for not doing so is highly flawed. However once you warned me ( and i believe you didn't have the authority to do so) i made no more edits of that page and was then banned for incedints thst took place 2 years ago. You are suppressing my right to free speech Factman67 (talk) 07:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]