User talk:Factcheck1024

May 2018

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Terri McCormick— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 00:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Terri McCormick. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Shellwood (talk) 00:44, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Terri McCormick

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Terri McCormick. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 32.218.152.244 (talk) 02:09, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation at Terri McCormick

Your addition to Terri McCormick has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. 32.218.152.244 (talk) 02:11, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Factcheck1024. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Terri McCormick, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Based on your writings at User:Factcheck1024/sandbox it appears that you are the subject of Terri McCormick. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Factcheck1024/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Factcheck1024/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:29, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Factcheck1024! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 01:29, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Factcheck1024 - I see that you are using your sandbox as an attempt to communicate with User:Shellwood. If you want to communicate with Shellwood, you may go to User talk:Shellwood. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:31, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you are Terri McCormick, please see the policy on biographies of living persons for correcting any information in the article about you. You may not introduce copyrighted material, even if you hold the copyright to the material. The preferred way to correct information in the article on Terri McCormick is to discuss at the article talk page, Talk:Terri McCormick. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:31, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:52, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the conflict of interest policy again. Please note that, if you are Terri McCormick, you are strongly discouraged from editing the article yourself, and if you do edit the article, your edits are likely to be reverted. Regardless of whether you are Terri McCormick (and we will trust that you are), all editors are strongly discouraged from inserting the sort of blatantly promotional language that you inserted and that was reverted. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for you to use to promote your professional career, and you do not have the right to request that a neutral description of your political career be deleted simply because it doesn't contain the right sort of marketing buzzspeak. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:16, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:31, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]