User talk:FJY2013

Ways to improve Horton Automatics Platform Doors

Hi, I'm Rasimmons. FJY2013, thanks for creating Horton Automatics Platform Doors!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs additional references to determine notability. This seems like a promising article, though.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. R. A. Simmons ^Talk 13:56, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, how is my edit unsourced? I referenced to https://www.sbstransit.com.sg/download/wab_201601.pdf which CLEARLY states 208 wheelchair bus services plus 11 which is 219. Which part of that are you confused about? 33ryantan (talk) 13:59, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And one more thing, please brush up on your English and sentence structure. It is rather horrendous. Thanks. 33ryantan (talk) 14:06, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mandai Depot, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 10:27, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Changchun Bombardier Movia C951

I am not sure what you are getting at, but even the Straits Times make it clear they are jointly built by Bombardier and CNR Changchun right from the beginning. Source The two batches are the same. - Mailer Diablo 11:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you, and also please reply to your own talkpage and 33ryantan to reply to him, he is unhappy with Charlesdrakew. Please solve the problem.11:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)FJY (talk)

Talkback

Well I'm not the Main user from Profile101. And I'm NOT the same from Profile101 as What I edited. And this GTX1975 was not the same as well. And the Profile101 Emails was not the same and was different. My account is FJY@yahoo.com. And the rest were different from me.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FJY2013 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have communicate with a problem that I edit disruptively and I sent a rude message to Charkesdrakew. Because I also learnt that I edit nonsensical languages. But also I'm very sorry that I am not a very good editor. I was based in Singapore and I ONLY edited Singapore pages. I did not vandalise user talkpages.

Decline reason:

You have three unblock requests, on two sock accounts and one IP address! I'm removing your ability to edit this talk page, and you have no chance of ever being unblocked if you keep on making new socks like this. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:15, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.