User talk:FEDERAL POLYTECHNIC AYEDE

Welcome!

Hi FEDERAL POLYTECHNIC AYEDE, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 18:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, FEDERAL POLYTECHNIC AYEDE. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 18:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Federal Polytechnic Ayede Nigeria (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Maliner was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Federal Polytechnic Ayede Nigeria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Maliner (talk) 18:50, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FEDERAL POLYTECHNIC AYEDE! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Maliner (talk) 18:50, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or website, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:51, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

FEDERAL POLYTECHNIC AYEDE (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Ahiol (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I know that my account has been blocked forever, but it will be necessary to appeal against this decision. The motive here is to contribute good content to Wikipedia and therefore it is my intention to adhere to the Policies of the Wikipedia site.

Here’s how I plan to address the requirements outlined in the unblock notice:

1. Disclosure of Compensation: I agree with the paid-contribution disclosure policy and state that I will follow it. I acknowledge that I may have a conflict of interest when editing or contributing to pages for which I could potentially be paid in the future. I will ensure transparency by declaring all paid contributions in accordance with Wikipedia’s rules and regulations, and by giving bias-free, factual, and sourced updates to the said pages.

2. Understanding of the Block: I know that my account was blocked for being promotional and too edit-war like not adhering to Wikipedia’s neutrality policy. More specifically, the page that I submitted was read more like the advertisement than an encyclopedic entry. Here, I have studied Wikipedia’s policies & guidelines seriously, with special focus on neutrality policy as well as conflict of interests policy. At least let me confirm to you that I will never repeat the action that made me receive this block.

3. Planned Contributions: In this case, I will enjoy the unrestricted access to Wikipedia and engage in reading educational and or information sharing articles. My edits will look to develop the wealth of knowledge that is Wikipedia through both inserting well sourced material as well as expanding on current knowledge while also fixing mistakes, all while abiding by neutrality policy. I will also not touch pages that I have conflict of interest unless I follow the guideline on conflict of interest very closely.

4. New Username: I am willing to come up with a brand new username that will meet the Wikipedia username policy. My proposed username is: "Ahiol" It does not endorse any company, organization or group and is in compliance with the provision of bias.

Many thanks for reading through my application.

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. PhilKnight (talk) 19:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FEDERAL POLYTECHNIC AYEDE (talk) 04:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

FEDERAL POLYTECHNIC AYEDE (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Ahiol (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I understand that my account has been blocked indefinitely, and I would like to request a review of my situation. I genuinely intend to make useful contributions to Wikipedia and will comply fully with the platform's guidelines.

Here’s how I plan to address the requirements outlined in the unblock notice:

1. Disclosure of Compensation: I confirm that I will comply with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement. I acknowledge that I have an intention to edit or create pages for which I may receive compensation in the future. I will ensure full transparency by following Wikipedia's paid-contribution disclosure guidelines and by editing such pages in a neutral, factual, and well-sourced manner.

2. Understanding of the Block: I understand that my account was blocked because my edits appeared promotional and did not meet Wikipedia's neutrality standards. Specifically, the page I submitted read more like an advertisement than an encyclopedic entry. I have thoroughly reviewed Wikipedia’s guidelines, including the rules on neutrality and conflict of interest, and I understand the importance of adhering to them strictly. I assure you that I will not repeat the behavior that led to this block.

3. Planned Contributions: If unblocked, I intend to focus on educational and informational articles. My contributions will aim to improve the quality of Wikipedia by adding reliable sources, expanding existing content, and correcting errors, all while adhering to Wikipedia’s neutrality policy. I will also avoid editing pages where I have a conflict of interest unless I strictly follow the conflict-of-interest guidelines.

4. New Username: I am prepared to create a new username that complies with Wikipedia’s username policy. My proposed username is: "Ahiol." It does not promote any company, organization, or group and aligns with the requirement for neutrality.

Thank you for considering my request. I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia’s policies and contributing positively to the community.

Decline reason:

Both zerogpt.com and gptzero.me claim this request was generated by an AI. We have no interest in AI chatbots editing Wikipedia. Yamla (talk) 17:38, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

FEDERAL POLYTECHNIC AYEDE (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Ahiol (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I know that my account has been blocked forever, but it will be necessary to appeal against this decision. The motive here is to contribute good content to Wikipedia and therefore it is my intention to adhere to the Policies of the Wikipedia site.

Here’s how I plan to address the requirements outlined in the unblock notice:

1. Disclosure of Compensation: I agree with the paid-contribution disclosure policy and state that I will follow it. I acknowledge that I may have a conflict of interest when editing or contributing to pages for which I could potentially be paid in the future. I will ensure transparency by declaring all paid contributions in accordance with Wikipedia’s rules and regulations, and by giving bias-free, factual, and sourced updates to the said pages.

2. Understanding of the Block: I know that my account was blocked for being promotional and too edit-war like not adhering to Wikipedia’s neutrality policy. More specifically, the page that I submitted was read more like the advertisement than an encyclopedic entry. Here, I have studied Wikipedia’s policies & guidelines seriously, with special focus on neutrality policy as well as conflict of interests policy. At least let me confirm to you that I will never repeat the action that made me receive this block.

3. Planned Contributions: In this case, I will enjoy the unrestricted access to Facebook and engage in reading educational and or information sharing articles. My edits will look to develop the wealth of knowledge that is Wikipedia through both inserting well sourced material as well as expanding on current knowledge while also fixing mistakes, all while abiding by neutrality policy. I will also not touch pages that I have conflict of interest unless I follow the guideline on conflict of interest very closely.

4. New Username: I am willing to come up with a brand new username that will meet the Wikipedia username policy. My proposed username is: "Ahiol" It does not endorse any company, organization or group and is in compliance with the provision of bias.

Many thanks for reading through my application.

Decline reason:

I am not prepared to unblock you to write about the polytechnic. If there are other subjects you want to edit, tell us about them in your next unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 20:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FEDERAL POLYTECHNIC AYEDE (talk) 12:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Federal Polytechnic Ayede Nigeria

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Federal Polytechnic Ayede Nigeria has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:51, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]