User talk:FDuffy

Documentary hypothesis - image

Hello FDuffy,

I have redrawn your diagram explaining the Documentary hypothesis, using Inkscape, into a scalable vector image: Image:Modern document hypothesis.svg (placed in the WikiMedia Commons). I have not included the legend text, since it takes then a lot of effort to include it into Wikipediae in other languages (I'm mainly working on the Croatian edition).

your image
the remake

Please take a look at Documentary hypothesis, and give me a note are you satisfied with the result, and if you feel any improvements should be made.

Best regards, --dnik ► 11:37, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kingsgenealogydiagram.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kingsgenealogydiagram.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 00:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Blessing of Moses

A tag has been placed on Blessing of Moses requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SAE (talk) 20:17, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello FDuffy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Jacob Milgrom - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:47, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Dan/Tel Dan

Merge discussion for Dan (biblical city)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dan (biblical city) , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Sreifa (talk) 10:19, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Territory of Zebulun

I posted a question in the talk page for Tribe_of_Zebulun. Seeing that you originally posted some of the relevant content that I posted about, I was hoping you could take a look and see if you can come up with an answer. Thanks! Junkernaught (talk) 04:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article Tahash Timeline

Please look at the article Tahash, and on the Discussion Page: "Consensus on Timeline" give your opinion about the Timeline. Thank you. --Michael Paul Heart (talk) 12:32, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Hebrew Prophets, nabiy' for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Hebrew Prophets, nabiy' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hebrew Prophets, nabiy' until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.. IZAK (talk) 08:51, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chronology of the Bible

A tag has been placed on Chronology of the Bible, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jeffro77 (talk) 07:45, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Speedy Deletion nomination was in error. Please see comments at article Talk.--Jeffro77 (talk) 08:27, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reuben (biblical person)

I am removing what you wrote in this edit citing the Jewish Encyclopedia that: In the Torah, Reuben is briefly described as having had sexual activity with Bilhah, his mother's maid; since his father had also done the same with Bilhah, leading to the birth of Reuben's half-brothers Dan and Naphtali, this is characterised as incest in classical rabbinical sources since I did not find any mention of that (Reuben's action being classified as incest) in the Jewish Encyclopedia. Please feel free to reinsert those words if you can provide a more exact source (for example, which JE article were you referring to). -- -- -- 20:40, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Roman Palestine (disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Roman Palestine (disambiguation) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 21 § Roman Palestine (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]