User talk:Ezra Ben Yosef

November 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 16:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ezra Ben Yosef (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am extremely apologetic for my recent reactions on Wikipedia, which was driven by anger of what I deemed to be subjective racism at that time and I was completely not thinking straight, I have been a long standing member of Wikipedia and have made over 200 edits and a few thanks which has now been deleted, I understand my actions at that time when changing a few words of a minor page back then could have been seen as vandalism but I always used a reference to back it up and even when it got reverted back it lead to more anger because I didn't understand why. Now I understand the precautions and I beg Administarators to reconsider this block because I hate to see my legacy on wikipedia go away for something so minor, I understand my mistake and my actions wasn't acceptable at that time and I ask for forgiveness I am a good man and I don't want to inflict any harm but enrich Wikipedia with my help, please understand and I swear something like this won't happen again.

Kind Regards.

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abuse of multiple accounts, but do not address this in your unblock request. In your next unblock request, you should clearly address this. PhilKnight (talk) 17:09, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ezra Ben Yosef, for an admin to seriously consider lifting this block, you will need to address the full issue. While you were initially blocked for edits on this account, if you are BasedHistorian PHD, you were sockpuppeting. BasedHistorian PHD was blocked indefinitely in 2023, first for disruptive editing and then for sockpuppeting, including a few accounts which were confirmed. An indefinite block isn't just a block of the account, but the person behind the account. I've seen people come back successfully even from making dozens of sockpuppet accounts, and far worse edits, but you will need to address both the edits and the multiple created sockpuppet accounts in full. I wish you the best of luck! CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 13:57, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ezra Ben Yosef (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Concerning the BasedHistorian PHD account it is not me nor do I have any affiliation to it, it is most likely another person who is in my institution where the account was made.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Confirmed to BasedHistorian. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 02:17, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, Ezra Ben Yosef,

I don't understand your unblock requests. In the original unblock request, you say that BasedHistorian PHD account is an old account that you haven't used in years. Now, the current request denies that it is yours or that you have any connection to it. One of these requests is inaccurate. Why would you try to provide a reason for your past use of BasedHistorian PHD account and then later claim that it is someone else's account? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:48, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The story in this specific appeal is not credible based on my review of the data for a separate sock (Apprentix) which you are also now confirmed to (cc Liz). You will need to 1) stop socking for a long time (several months), and 2) tell the truth about your socking to have a successful appeal. Please review WP:GAB also. Izno (talk) 02:09, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For starters I have absolutely no connection to Appretix at all and I've never heard of him.

The BasedHistorian PHD account was me and that's out of truthal honesty because I understand I did something in the past shouldn't limit the good work I'm doing for Wikipedia now, I've learnt from my lessons and this ban has been a burden for me, please just give me one of second chance or forgiveness. Ezra Ben Yosef (talk) 02:21, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lies followed by lies followed by lies. The standard offer is available to you; I'll make it easier by removing access to this page so you can stop lying to us for a while. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:34, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.