User talk:Ezekiel63745

Signature test

Ezekiel! ^{Talk to meh.See what I'm doin'.} 03:14, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Warning tests;

Do NOT subst these templates. These are examples, and I don't actually wanna burn the messages into my talk page, so they should be easier to remove, because they are just tests. Ezekiel! ^{Talk to meh.See what I'm doin'.} 21:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Ezekiel's Templates Delete Discussion

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ezuw-vandalism4 Template:Ezuw-vandalism4 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:48, 26 October 2010 (UTC) October 2010 Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Templates for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Templates for deletion debates, as you did with Template:Ezuw-vandalism4. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. QU TalkQu 21:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC) Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Template:Ezuw-vandalism4. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:15, 26 October 2010 (UTC) Speedy deletion of "Template:Ezuw-vandalism5a" A page you created, Template:Ezuw-vandalism5a, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish. You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Thank you. Funandtrvl (talk) 22:17, 26 October 2010 (UTC) Speedy deletion of "Template:Ezuw-vandalism3" A page you created, Template:Ezuw-vandalism3, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish. You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Thank you. Funandtrvl (talk) 22:19, 26 October 2010 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Template:Ezuw-vandalism4, you may be blocked from editing. Just leave it alone and let the discussion proceed, or you are likely to be blocked from editing - if the consensus decides your templates are acceptable, then you can keep them -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:19, 26 October 2010 (UTC) I didn't do it this time; I just put a reason why it should be deleted. Ezekiel! Talk to meh.See what I'm doin'. 22:21, 26 October 2010 (UTC) You tried the "noinclude" trick again. And you should not place your reasoning on the template page itself, you should do so only in the deletion discussion - the deletion tag already contains a link to the discussion, so people will know where to go to take part. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC) Speedy deletion of "Template:Ezuw-vandalism2" A page you created, Template:Ezuw-vandalism2, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish. You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Thank you. Funandtrvl (talk) 22:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC) Speedy deletion of "Template:Ezuw-vandalism1" A page you created, Template:Ezuw-vandalism1, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish. You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Thank you. Funandtrvl (talk) 22:24, 26 October 2010 (UTC) NO FAIR!!! Only I would use those. So they is no reason to delete those. Okay? Ezekiel! Talk to meh.See what I'm doin'. 22:25, 26 October 2010 (UTC) You have no control over who can use those templates. If they're on Wikipedia, ANYONE can use them, there is no way to restrict that, and the problem is that these templates are like "phishing" templates, they're so close to the real ones, that we don't want anyone to be confused. The real vandalism warning templates also hook into "huggle" and other vandal fighting programs, so I ask you, if you are templating someone for vandalism, PLEASE use the real templates, not yours, because they work with the reporting system for wp:aiv. Thank you, --Funandtrvl (talk) 22:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC) So they should be on, like, the Wikimedia Commons instead? Ezekiel! Talk to meh.See what I'm doin'. 22:33, 26 October 2010 (UTC) NO! Commons is for photos, not templates. In their present form, don't use them, because they won't work for "counting" the number of vandal edits (currently 4) before reporting the user (usually an IP) to wp:aiv. PLEASE READ: WP:VANDALISM on how you can help out constructively! Also see WP:USERPAGES on how to create subpages, for you to create templates w/o making them "live". Again, templates are for everyone to use, so, if you would please move the templates to one of your user sub-pages, that would be appreciated (and don't forget to tag them for deletion.) Thank you! --Funandtrvl (talk) 22:47, 26 October 2010 (UTC) Okay. I moved each and every one to my user sub pages. But I have to leave the deletion templates there? Ezekiel! Talk to meh.See what I'm doin'. 22:52, 26 October 2010 (UTC) Um... scratch that above. I can't move them. I only started Wikipedia a day ago, so I'm not autoconfirmed. Could you perhaps move them for me? Link to move each and every one; Template:Ezuw-vandalism1 --> User:Ezekiel63745/ezuw-vandalism1 Template:Ezuw-vandalism2 --> User:Ezekiel63745/ezuw-vandalism2 Template:Ezuw-vandalism3 --> User:Ezekiel63745/ezuw-vandalism3 Template:Ezuw-vandalism4 --> User:Ezekiel63745/ezuw-vandalism4 Template:Ezuw-vandalism5a --> User:Ezekiel63745/ezuw-vandalism5a Ezekiel! Talk to meh.See what I'm doin'. 22:55, 26 October 2010 (UTC) okay, will do! --Funandtrvl (talk) 23:02, 26 October 2010 (UTC) Well, I clearly saw you moved the level one template to my user page, but the rest are still templated. You need links to do this? Here. Notes: All moves are completed now. Template:Ezuw-vandalism1 --> User:Ezekiel63745/ezuw-vandalism1 = Completed Template:Ezuw-vandalism2 --> User:Ezekiel63745/ezuw-vandalism2 = Completed Template:Ezuw-vandalism3 --> User:Ezekiel63745/ezuw-vandalism3 = Completed Template:Ezuw-vandalism4 --> User:Ezekiel63745/ezuw-vandalism4 = Completed Template:Ezuw-vandalism5a --> User:Ezekiel63745/ezuw-vandalism5a = Completed Ezekiel! Talk to meh.See what I'm doin'. 23:10, 26 October 2010 (UTC) give me time!! I'm also templating the redirect in template space to be deleted. --Funandtrvl (talk) 23:12, 26 October 2010 (UTC) Okay, I'm done. I also removed the "live" templates from your talk pg, so that doesn't get deleted too. --Funandtrvl (talk) 23:26, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Maybe you could contribute to WikiProject Templates?

Since you've proven you're very good at writing templates, maybe you should consider assisting WP:WikiProject Templates? I know they could use some help, especially fixing template errors (I work on that myself, sometimes), see: Category:Wikipedia template parameter issues, there are thousands in there. You should also peruse WP:CUV and WP:CVU for the projects on fighting vandalism. Cheers!! --Funandtrvl (talk) 23:35, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Just a suggestion, the smaller version for WP Templates is: {{User:Willscrlt/UBX/UbxWPT1Crochets}} it probably would look better within the vertical box, because the one on your user page is the big (wide) one, which could go at the bottom of your user page. Just a suggestion!! --Funandtrvl (talk) 00:03, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Ezekiel63745, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Ezekiel63745. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Punctuation marks

Hi. Regarding Punctuation marks, see Template talk:Punctuation marks#Typeface for blown-up symbols. I do agree with that Exclamation mark looks a bit odd with a square dot. Which mark were you looking at, and thinking it needed to be squarer? (reply here, or at the template's talkpage :) -- Quiddity (talk) 03:38, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Apology

I apologize for my mistaken revert at User talk:Ledenierhomme. You, of course, have done nothing wrong. I have reverted my revert and removed my warning template. Guoguo12--Talk--  23:50, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Oh, my pink X? Whoops.

Looks like I forgot all about it... I'll do it now. Rory ^{What did I do wrong?} 07:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Done - Rory ^{What did I do wrong?} 19:20, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the revert on my talk page. The poem was, at least, a little more creative than the usual vandal's insults. Not that it didn't need reverting...it did. Cmichael (talk) 13:53, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it was funny too. Not insulting? He simply copied that off the YouTube video "YouTube Is My Life". It would be insulting if you had a YouTube account. XD And one of the users figured out his/her location, and found out it was a proxy, because the first three contributions from that vandalizing IP are useful (two reverting some vandalism, and one adding a good part on a template). So maybe it IS shared. One person is being nice, while the other is just so naughty leaving personal attacks, so I think he shouldn't be welcome on Wikipedia. Ezekiel! ^{Talk to meh.See what I'm doin'.} 18:31, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

He is certainly not welcome on my talk page. Overall, I've learned not to be offended by vandals. I just smile and move on with my patrolling. Cmichael (talk) 01:55, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Your RFA

I'd advise you to withdraw it. You've only been here for a matter of days. It takes some people years to get the bit. I'm not trying to make you feel bad or anything but if you try to work in admin related areas, and come back in say 6-12 months, you may stand a chance :) All the best,--White Shadows ^{Your guess is as good as mine} 23:53, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Meanwhile, keep up the good work with templates. You've hit a corner that not as many folks work in, and where you can really help with your coding etc skills. Elen of the Roads (talk) 00:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Yes, please don't be discouraged. Your contributions are good, but experience comes with time. I echo White Shadows and Elen; keep it up. If you have any questions, you can always drop by my talk page and ask :). Nice to meet you, BTW. Airplaneman ✈ 00:05, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi there - I'm sorry I have closed your RfA per WP:NOTNOW. As above, I'd be happy to help if you have any questions. Keep up the good work. --Mkativerata (talk) 00:10, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

On another note, this edit and this edit both have no reason for the undoes. If you can't supply a reason in your edit summary, don't undo it. Simple as that. For this, aren't people allowed to have any fun? SPI is a pretty boring place. Unless you can give a valid reason for the first two undoes, I'm going to change them back soon. Thanks, /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 01:35, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Re-adding that false block notice could easily constitute disruptive editing. Please do not re-add it again. Wikipedia is not MySpace or your playpen. You can have fun, but please don't mess with block notices like that, because it could mislead someone who's not reading closely. Thanks, /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 03:06, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Octagon-warning EPIC.svg

A tag has been placed on File:Octagon-warning EPIC.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Dædαlus ^Contribs 09:53, 4 December 2010 (UTC)