Jump to content

User talk:Ezekiel63745

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Signature test

[edit]

Ezekiel! Talk to meh.See what I'm doin'. 03:14, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning tests;

[edit]

Do NOT subst these templates. These are examples, and I don't actually wanna burn the messages into my talk page, so they should be easier to remove, because they are just tests. Ezekiel! Talk to meh.See what I'm doin'. 21:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you could contribute to WikiProject Templates?

[edit]

Since you've proven you're very good at writing templates, maybe you should consider assisting WP:WikiProject Templates? I know they could use some help, especially fixing template errors (I work on that myself, sometimes), see: Category:Wikipedia template parameter issues, there are thousands in there. You should also peruse WP:CUV and WP:CVU for the projects on fighting vandalism. Cheers!! --Funandtrvl (talk) 23:35, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just a suggestion, the smaller version for WP Templates is: {{User:Willscrlt/UBX/UbxWPT1Crochets}} it probably would look better within the vertical box, because the one on your user page is the big (wide) one, which could go at the bottom of your user page. Just a suggestion!! --Funandtrvl (talk) 00:03, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

[edit]

Hey there Ezekiel63745, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Ezekiel63745. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

  • See a log of files removed today here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Punctuation marks

[edit]

Hi. Regarding Punctuation marks, see Template talk:Punctuation marks#Typeface for blown-up symbols. I do agree with that Exclamation mark looks a bit odd with a square dot. Which mark were you looking at, and thinking it needed to be squarer? (reply here, or at the template's talkpage :) -- Quiddity (talk) 03:38, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

[edit]

I apologize for my mistaken revert at User talk:Ledenierhomme. You, of course, have done nothing wrong. I have reverted my revert and removed my warning template. Guoguo12--Talk--  23:50, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my pink X? Whoops.

[edit]

Looks like I forgot all about it... I'll do it now. Rory What did I do wrong? 07:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Rory What did I do wrong? 19:20, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for the revert on my talk page. The poem was, at least, a little more creative than the usual vandal's insults. Not that it didn't need reverting...it did. Cmichael (talk) 13:53, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it was funny too. Not insulting? He simply copied that off the YouTube video "YouTube Is My Life". It would be insulting if you had a YouTube account. XD And one of the users figured out his/her location, and found out it was a proxy, because the first three contributions from that vandalizing IP are useful (two reverting some vandalism, and one adding a good part on a template). So maybe it IS shared. One person is being nice, while the other is just so naughty leaving personal attacks, so I think he shouldn't be welcome on Wikipedia. Ezekiel! Talk to meh.See what I'm doin'. 18:31, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He is certainly not welcome on my talk page. Overall, I've learned not to be offended by vandals. I just smile and move on with my patrolling. Cmichael (talk) 01:55, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your RFA

[edit]

I'd advise you to withdraw it. You've only been here for a matter of days. It takes some people years to get the bit. I'm not trying to make you feel bad or anything but if you try to work in admin related areas, and come back in say 6-12 months, you may stand a chance :) All the best,--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 23:53, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile, keep up the good work with templates. You've hit a corner that not as many folks work in, and where you can really help with your coding etc skills. Elen of the Roads (talk) 00:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please don't be discouraged. Your contributions are good, but experience comes with time. I echo White Shadows and Elen; keep it up. If you have any questions, you can always drop by my talk page and ask :). Nice to meet you, BTW. Airplaneman 00:05, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - I'm sorry I have closed your RfA per WP:NOTNOW. As above, I'd be happy to help if you have any questions. Keep up the good work. --Mkativerata (talk) 00:10, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


On another note, this edit and this edit both have no reason for the undoes. If you can't supply a reason in your edit summary, don't undo it. Simple as that. For this, aren't people allowed to have any fun? SPI is a pretty boring place. Unless you can give a valid reason for the first two undoes, I'm going to change them back soon. Thanks, /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 01:35, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re-adding that false block notice could easily constitute disruptive editing. Please do not re-add it again. Wikipedia is not MySpace or your playpen. You can have fun, but please don't mess with block notices like that, because it could mislead someone who's not reading closely. Thanks, /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 03:06, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Octagon-warning EPIC.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — dαlus Contribs 09:53, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]