User talk:Eyeguy3

Sorry, I am not Cogswobble. If you're wondering, Numbuh48 used one of his sockpuppets to do this.

However, I am Bwburke94. But this account is NOT made for vandalism. This is simply an alternate account. Eyeguy3 (talk) 23:16, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page edits

When adding comments to a talk page, it is impolite to add comments in the middle of another person's comment. Add your comments at the bottom of the section. Also, do not correct spelling or grammar in another person's comments. Unlike the articles (in which you are begged to correct spelling and grammar), the comments on talk pages belong to the author of the comment and should not be changed. --Kainaw ^(talk) 20:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Super Bowl MVP

Hey, I just split the entries for the Super Bowl XII Co-MVPs back into two rows. I noticed that you were the one who merged them into one row. My thought on splitting them was that it's the section is called "List of Super Bowl MVPs" as opposed to "List of Super Bowls", so it made more sense to me to list the players individually, especially since there's some individualized info (Hall of Fame) in the row. Thoughts? Cogswobble 19:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why blocked?

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Eyeguy3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

128.119.236.140 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Yaya0". The reason given for Yaya0's block is: "Vandalism only account".

Blocking administrator: Netsnipe (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have now been blocked from editing Wikipedia for 1 week after violating our Wikipedia:Sock puppetry policy which prohibits the use of multiple accounts especially for vandalism. It is clear from this edit that you and the vandal Yaya0 are one and the same. Should you be caught vandalizing Wikipedia again, you may be indefinitely blocked and an abuse report will be sent to the University of Massachusetts IT department so that further action may be taken against you. -- Netsnipe ► 17:44, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What happened here?

On further review of the edits made by Yaya0 (talk • contribs) and the severity of the disruption caused by that account, your block has been extended to 1 month. -- Netsnipe ► 18:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back now

And I will not use any more sock puppets. (probably)

June 2007

Yankees-Red Sox rivalry becomes Red Sox-Yankees rivalry

What's the reason? And why didn't you discuss first on the talk page?Djdickmutt 22:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yes, i have to agree with the above. and I'm a red sox fan. BH (T|C) (Go Red Sox!) 00:18, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the Sox have won more championships this century... Eyeguy3 (talk)

Attacks in the article Assholes for deletion

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Assholes for deletion. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Iknowyourider (t c) 16:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did to Wikipedia:Assholes for deletion, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wildthing61476 16:09, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack count: 3. There will not be a fourth. Eyeguy3 16:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tomorrow's weather in London

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Tomorrow's weather in London, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Acroterion _(talk) 01:19, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate account

Since this account is supposedly not for vandalism, please don't create nonsense articles, no matter how clever you think the titles are. Acroterion _(talk) 01:24, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I wanted to reserve the article title.

Page move of Aluminium

Eyeguy3, I have reverted your move of Aluminium. First off you moved it to a misspelling: the US English word is spelled "Aluminum" not "Alumnium" as you wrote. Second, the page should not be moved from the UK English spelling to the US English spelling anyway. As the article clearly states it uses UK English spelling, so the article title should remain consistent with that. If you want to change the article title you must reach consensus with other editors on the article's talk page first. Please be more careful in the future. Thanks, Gwernol 16:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I intentionally misspelled the title as the page "Aluminum" already existed, so I couldn't move it there. Eyeguy3 (talk) 16:45, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which then begs the question of why you wanted to move it in the first place. Acroterion _(talk) 16:47, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Acroterion - what made you think that moving the page to a misspelling was acceptable? Moving a page to an incorrectly spelled version is vandalism. Please do not do anything like that again. The fact that the page Aluminum already existed (as a redirect to Aluminium) should have told you that your attempted move was a bad idea. In these circumstances, deliberately moving it to the wrong spelling is a very bad course of action. You should have discussed the issue on the talk page instead. Gwernol 16:49, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And given your apparent problem with multiple accounts as noted farther up the page, you're on very thin ice. Acroterion _(talk) 16:59, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry and vandalism with alternate accounts (i.e. User:Tetrax994). If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Black Kite 19:27, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eyeguy3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I said, Numbuh48 did this. Now if he would stop adding 1 to the numbers in people's usernames...

Decline reason:

No reason given to unblock, nor evidence that the block was in error. UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 20:06, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.