User talk:Extremeguy

Blocked as a sock puppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected to be a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. MuZemike 21:15, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Extremeguy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will amit that I am to this http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Fjfhgfhdstty But I tried to floow the rules on this http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Legitimate_uses_of_alternative_accounts and it said to add this {{User Alt Acct Master}}. i just kept not trying not to get blocked

Decline reason:

I'd love to see you try to answer Hersfold's question. On the surface, I'm declining this. You were evading a block, which is definitely not a legitimate use of alternate accounts. Mango juice^talk 02:24, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Could you explain why you felt this was a legitimate use of another account? In general, it's one editing account per person. The legitimate uses are rather limited and specific. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:10, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Extremeguy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

no one explained why I was blocked on my first account, so i created another one. also I tryed to do better every time. So i desrive an another chance.

Decline reason:

I see realistically concise explanations of the blocks on your other accounts. I also see a statement from you that you understand the rules, and promise to abide by them. Your creation of further sockpuppets, such as this one, demonstrates that both your statement and your promise cannot be relied on. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 19:36, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You should go back, log in on your main account (the one that was blocked), and request unblocking there. But I get the impression you have created several sockpuppets before, so do not expect to be unblocked anytime soon. Perhaps if you were to cease editing under any account (as you are supposed to, since you're blocked) for a long time, say 6 months, the community might be willing to trust you with another chance. Mango juice^talk 18:23, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Extremeguy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay I am not the sock of Simulation12 but I am the sock of Fjfhgfhdstty. The case got put together at the last minute and I can't even go back to my orginal account. So give me another chance.

Decline reason:

Checkuser-confirmed sock of a vandalism-only account--and in any event, the repeated copyright violations are by themselves worthy of a block. Talk page disabled. Blueboy 96 19:53, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.