User talk:Explodingrabbit
A tag has been placed on Timothy Rood, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Basketballone10 03:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Timothy Rood
[edit]A tag has been placed on Timothy Rood, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. L. Pistachio (talk) 03:47, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]1. Please do not tell me to chill, I find it rather offensive
2. It was not a significant article, I do not believe
4 (I'll skip 3). Make sections for messages so that it doesn't look like someone else is trying to make my talk page a paracite and
5. Sign your messages.
Thank you very much. Basketballone10 03:50, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
- Exploding Rabbit, I do think that you have the right of Freedom of Speech... yes indeed you do, but this is not the appropriate site to use your freedoms on, when creating Timothy Rood pages. Those are social websites (e.g. Myspace, facebook). Thank you. Basketballone10 04:00, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Timothy Rood, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Basketballone10 03:54, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
- I removed the last word of your comment, which by the way was misspelled. I am sorry, but maybe you should make a notable article. See WP:NOTABLE. If you've got any questions, feel free to contact me. Basketball110 i'm not yik ginlyùn 04:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
February 2008
[edit]
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Timothy Rood, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Nkrosse (talk) 03:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.
Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.
If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 04:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia
[edit]
|
Basketball110 i'm not yik ginlyùn 04:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- How are you doing? Basketball110 this user says "cheers" 04:41, 21 February 2008 (UTC)