User talk:Exhistorian

Gardenkur talk page

Hello Exhistorian, I noticed that you pinged me, but I don't know why. Please refresh my memory by providing more context? With additional prodding, I might remember, and then will be glad to help if possible. Thank you. FeralOink (talk) 12:59, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Exhistorian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! FeralOink (talk) 13:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ayar people (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbrks was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ayar people and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Pbrks ^(t • c) 04:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Exhistorian! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – Pbrks ^(t • c) 04:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Konguhead per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Konguhead. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 04:01, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Exhistorian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not his/her socks. I'm using this account for long period. Contributing good to Wikipedia. Also, you people blocked the sock already https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Periyavelar99 . If a user requesting socks request can't be mean that user is a sock too.

Decline reason:

Despite your claim, this account is fairly new. Additionally, a simple denial is insufficient; you have to address the concerns found at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Konguhead/Archive. Yamla (talk) 17:26, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop targetting good faith editors

@Suneye1 Hey, I see you're from TamilNadu. I appreciate your works. I was reading Karnataka and Tamil dynasties and their origins history, this is how I came to the vellalar talk page. I was reading the talk age, some talks were seemed to be true as their refs. If I was a sock, why would I comment to the past socks? Won't it create a doubt about me? Also your statements of the investigates seems blocking all editors who comes to Vellalar Talk page. Some seems are POV.

Despite that, I'm contributing good to the Indian Wikipedia articles. Also, I'm improving many important articles for IAS exam aspirants. Because South Indian history is important for cracking UPSC exams. But you just smashed out my good faith and the editorial journey.

@YamlaI know most socks will deny, But why should I accept the ban when I was doing no mistakes? It's disappointing that my time and contributions on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is for everyone, not for privileged people only. I strongly sense there's communism and leftism on Wikipedia. This block is an accident or misunderstanding. I addressed my concern. Thanks for your valuable time. Exhistorian (talk) 04:01, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]