User talk:Exacom Media

Welcome!

Hello, Exacom Media, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Exacom Media, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! S0091 (talk) 20:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Exacom Media

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Exacom Media, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. S0091 (talk) 20:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 20:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Exacom Media (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

New username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Reason Exacom Media (talk) 21:32, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You forgot to address your inappropriate edits. Yamla (talk) 21:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

raerae2020 is the new username.

I can't remember every mundane stuff I do so my using a Username I have been using for years now give me credibility if any concerns maybe arise. I have nothing to hide can't say the same thing for all the gatekeepers here.

Read WP:PROMO, WP:ORGNAME and WP:GAB. S0091 (talk) 21:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With all that dense verbiage of references I still can show you guys more than one incorrect things on Wikipedia. Without scientific research and data it helps to put things in the right context. And without it nothing can be objective or should be used as a model to express anything. I am not a newspaper columnist, corrresponder or journalist. The dictionary should be the last arbiter for words but the rules have been change with the rise of social media and technology. Exacom Media is just my way of addressing that one problem because they're many.

Alot of things that are just anecdotes of my experience always become apart of others buzzwords, jargon, methods or news that is now deem fit to print. My so-called inappropriate edits is written to comment on alot of articles that attempts to give a chronicle of the changing medium for marketing and advertising on the web. Which isn't factual engaging in estimates and extrapolation without any actual scaling or accredited metrics.

So if you all have a problem with my indiscretion my humble apologies to any I offended. I stand corrected on anything I do wrong. Exacom Media (talk) 22:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]