User talk:Eviolite/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Eviolite. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Help to add a new language to an article
Hi there!
I've translated an article from Persian into English and I want to publish it. However, Wikipedia says that publishing translations is limited to experienced users.
This is the translated page (in English): Draft:Public Voice
And this is the original article (in Persian): آوای مردمی
Can you please help add the English translation as another language to the original article?
Thank you very much! Hobabe.shisheh (talk) 22:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Hobabe.shisheh, thanks for reaching out. Unfortunately, just because an article exists on a different language version of Wikipedia does not mean that it meets the English Wikipedia's content guidelines, and in particular, it seems like the draft has large amounts of uncited text, which is problematic (especially when discussing living people). Verifiability is one of the core policies of Wikipedia, and it seems that the independent sources cited do not verify most of the article's content. I would recommend waiting until an active AfC reviewer takes a look at your draft for more thorough feedback; unfortunately I personally have not had much time to contribute to Wikipedia recently. eviolite (talk) 00:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks eviolite ! Really appreciate your input. The reason for few independent sources is that really there are very few English sources for the content. Can I use the Persian lanuage sources to further support it with sources?
- Since there very few English sources for this band, this Wikipedia entry could really help them being more recognised for their work in New Zealand now that they have settled in this country. Would you be so kind to introduce me to a colleague of your who could potentially review this? (or can I ask you to please review this if you find some time as it is a short one, would sincerely appreciate it). Hobabe.shisheh (talk) 04:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Hobabe.shisheh: Sources in other languages are allowed, yes. I and many other AfC reviewers do not take review requests, as it would be unfair to other drafts waiting in the queue and because we are all volunteers. eviolite (talk) 17:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
hi i need you
Add topic TK lerato (talk) 15:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
ok ok
i can help what is it TK lerato (talk) 15:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
WikiCup 2024 July newsletter
The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.
The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:
- Generalissima (submissions) with 1,059 points, mostly from 1 featured article on DeLancey W. Gill, 11 good articles, 18 did you know nominations, and dozens of reviews;
- Skyshifter (submissions) with 673 points, mostly from 2 featured articles on Worlds (Porter Robinson album) and I'm God, 5 good articles, and 2 did you know nominations;
- Sammi Brie (submissions) with 557 points, mostly from 1 featured article on KNXV-TV, 5 good articles, and 8 did you know nominations; and
- AryKun (submissions) with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.
The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
WikiCup 2024 August newsletter
The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:
- Generalissima (submissions) with 1,150 points, mostly from 3 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 7 good articles, and 13 did you know nominations;
- Arconning (submissions) with 791 points, mostly from 2 featured lists, 8 good articles, 4 did you know nominations, and plenty of reviews;
- AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 718 points, mostly from a high-multiplier featured article on Genghis Khan and 2 good articles; and
- BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 714 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Susanna Hoffs, 2 featured lists, and 3 good articles.
Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Surreal Barnstar | |
Can't believe that the WORLD FAMOUS West Maple Rock got an article, and that I wasn't the one to write it. Well done. –DMartin 03:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC) |