User talk:Evgeniychub

Welcome!

Hello, Evgeniychub, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Trutatata, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Peasantwarrior (talk) 09:16, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Trutatata

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Peasantwarrior (talk) 09:16, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Trutatata

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Trutatata. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 09:20, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sagatest

A tag has been placed on Sagatest requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 11:09, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Truta. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Barret (talk) 15:37, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Trutata

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Barret (talk) 15:41, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard.In addition to the three pages mentioned above you have created at least two other completely unsuitable page which have been deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:48, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Truta

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Davnor (talk) 16:19, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Truta. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Davnor (talk) 16:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Truta. Uncle Dick (talk) 16:55, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please confine your experiments to the WP:Sandbox. Do not make test edits in the main encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 17:20, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears to be running a bot script without approval. This is in violation of Wikipedia policy. All automated or semi-automated scripts must be approved by the Bot Approvals Group to ensure that they are performing safe and useful functions, and are not abusing system resources. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 18:17, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Sorry for my bot, but i did not have an idea that it should be approved. Now its clear for me that before performing any actions using bot I should get approval from bot approval group. Please unblock my account, because it is very important for my work.}} This request is puzzling to me; I cannot think of any reason that you would need Wikipedia 'for your work.' Can you explain what kinds of edits you would be making if unblocked? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Evgeniychub (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Actually, I'm working on bot creation that will be used to publish articles to WikiMedia, during testing I have been blocked. Could you unblock my account so I can proceed. Or please provide me with guidance how I can test WikiMedia bot. The operations, bot is supposed to perform, are creation and edition of articles. I need my bot to be tested before I can go for approval process as this process will verify my bot I need it be finished before.

Decline reason:

Please don't use another unblock template to respond to queries from adminstrators

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Actually, I'm working on bot creation that will be used to publish articles to WikiMedia, during testing I have been blocked. Could you unblock my account so I can proceed. Or please provide me with guidance how I can test WikiMedia bot. The operations, bot is supposed to perform, are creation and edition of articles. I need my bot to be tested before I can go for approval process as this process will verify my bot I need it be finished before.

I don't know the answer to this question- I'm afraid I haven't programmed since my elementary-school BASIC lessons. I'll leave the unblock request open, so someone with more knowledge can help you. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:47, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'v left a notice at Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard asking for a bot-running admin to review this request. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:40, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

You are unblocked on the condition that you do not use your account for automated editing, and that any bot edits be run from an approved bot account. Further you shall not 'trial' the bot without WP:BAG approval. –xeno^talk 17:41, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.