User talk:Euroski

Speedy deletion of South American Biathlon Championship

A tag has been placed on South American Biathlon Championship requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. SGGH ^speak! 09:00, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of South American Biathlon Championship

A tag has been placed on South American Biathlon Championship requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. BradV 17:53, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from South American Biathlon Championship, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. BradV 17:54, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Federacion Venezolana de Deportes de Invierno has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Fozto diario.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fozto diario.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:12, 10 November 2008 (UTC) --Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:12, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of tags

Please stop removing clean up tags from pages that need them. the Baena page does have a large list of references, but no citations, so the {{citations}} tag is an accurate one. The 2010 Winter Olympics page is a future event and does have sourcing issues, so those tags are also accurate. As for Baena being in the games, he may have made the Venezuela team, but he can not have officially qualified for the Olympics yet as qualification in the sport has not yet begun. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 13:11, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced information

Please do not readd that statement to Cesar Baena without an outside source. I see many pages saying he's *preparing* for 2010, but so far as I know, no one has qualified for 2010 yet. We need a source saying specifically that. If you readd that while blatantly ignoring this or not responding to this, you may be blocked. --Golbez (talk) 02:43, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

César Baena moved to César Baena (footballer)

Hi. After a brief comparison of the articles and sources it was clear the skier is today the main subject, so I moved César Baena to César Baena (footballer). If you wish to move Cesar Baena (skier) to César Baena (now a redirect) you are now free to do so, but you will probably need a WP:RM to do so because some people may think César Baena (now a redirect) should be a disambiguation page. If you need any help let me know. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:53, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of César Baena for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article César Baena is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/César Baena until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:40, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bernardo Baena for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bernardo Baena is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernardo Baena until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:40, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Your addition to César Baena has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:45, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cesar Baena moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cesar Baena, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nightmare Rarity_{Enter the palace} 11:52, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cesar Baena

Hello, Euroski. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cesar Baena".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:36, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, I'm Arms & Hearts. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kiwi.com, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:10, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]