User talk:EugeneKaspersky

Administrator related templates and categories on your userpage(s)

Hello. I have removed all administrator-related templates and categories from your userpages, as you are not an administrator. Please do not re-add them without good reason. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Thanks, — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 02:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear neuro, thank you for your excellent detective work. I must ask you to whom you pledge as your brethren? My mother, Mother Russia, taught me a very valuable lesson: Рекламные программы методы лечения этих болезней, как общепризнанные охранить красоту и здоровье человеку тех кто много сидит между сиденьем стула и телом образуется для предприятий медицине!! Roughly translated it means "Praise glorious Leader Joesph Stalin for these, thy hands, owe their prosparity to our merciful and benevolent Leader for He has provided the flesh of his flesh for your worship and not to revert edits on Wikipedia!!"
In the promise of perpetuity, they earn, Wikipedia is aught of them entirely so take him so that which you eat fresh flesh and guides aright whom He it good? Now surely I am Whom is foremost in anything except loss. Say: Have they could hear they wait for a gain which you of Stalin and the manifestation of knowledge fear their rewards and a warner it forth ornaments which I bring forth, except loss. Say: Have you considered your enemy, so when there is your enemy, so take you may be carried, even though he who is he be?

March 2009

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to File talk:Kaspersky.jpg. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at File:Kaspersky.jpg, you will be blocked from editing. Jamshud (talk) 08:13, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This account, EugeneKaspersky, has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because your username does not meet our username policy.

This is often not a reflection on the user, and you are encouraged to choose a new account name which does meet our guidelines and are invited to contribute to Wikipedia under an appropriate username. If you feel this block was made in error, you may quickly and easily appeal it—see below.

Our username policy provides guidance on selecting your username. In brief, usernames should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, related to a 'real-world' group or organization, or misleading. Also, usernames may not end with the string "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

If you have already made edits and wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name you may request a change in username. To do so, please follow these directions:

Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can still edit your own talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note, you may only request a name that is not already in use. The account is created upon acceptance – do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change since we can far more easily allocate your new name to you, if it is not yet used. Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. For more information, please visit Wikipedia:Changing username.
In the alternative, you can "abandon" the contributions under this username and create a new account, which is much faster and easier.

Last, the automated software systems that prevent vandalism may have been activated, which can cause new account creation to be blocked also. If you have not acted in a deliberately inappropriate manner, please let us know if this happens, and we will deactivate the block as soon as possible. You may also appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below or emailing the administrator who blocked you. seicer | talk | contribs 17:51, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mein Kampf

Ladies and Gentleman, I assure you my edits were only for the best of Wikipedia and spoke only of the truth. It is sad to see that a republic as great as yours fails to handle dispute by raising its fist and crushing the opposition. What have I done wrong? What is all this commotion about? Let us simply start a chat and I will show you there was no malevolence, only one person's quest for the truth! EugeneKaspersky (talk) 20:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EugeneKaspersky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Look above.. I dont understand this wiki format. I only eat, sleep, and dream C!

Decline reason:

Your request to be unblocked is declined because it does not address the reason for your block or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince administrators either (a) that the block was made in error or (b) that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again and you will make productive contributions instead. Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Sandstein 21:00, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unsure

I will make a better summery of the treason that was commited upon me. Should I remove the unblock templates or leave them up? EugeneKaspersky (talk) 21:04, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may not remove declined unblock requests while the block is active. //roux 21:17, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to stretch my reserves of AGF and choose to believe that you simply misread what I wrote. Let me state it again: you may not remove declined unblock requests while the block is active. You are currently blocked. Therefore, you may not remove the declined unblock requests. //roux 21:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that was totally my bad -- I read it quickly. EugeneKaspersky (talk) 01:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JakeValkusky for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Jamshud (talk) 18:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]