Jump to content

User talk:EttGlassVin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EttGlassVin (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please unblock me, this is not what it looks like, you see, someone else, I don't know who, and don't ask me why, had managed to steal my password upon creation of this account. That is why these edits reflect poor Wikipedia taste, but I can assure you, I have changed my password and I will now do a good job as a positive contributor, if only I am given the chance.

Decline reason:

I find it odd that you have a similar name to VillDuHaEttGlassVin who is also using the same unblock excuse. Denied. — IrishGuy talk 01:48, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EttGlassVin (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please unblock me, I have nothing to do with the sockpuppets you speak of, and am telling the honest truth. Once again, I have changed my password and everything, and I could prove all this 100+% if I am given another chance. What can I do to prove I have only the best intentions? One must assume good faith, you know.

Decline reason:

This unblock request does not address your block. — Yamla 00:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EttGlassVin (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It DID address my block, I was stating that I had nothing to do with those edits. Ichtragtkeineschuhe took my password and thus, hijacked my account. Why doesn't anyone here believe me, why don't they believe some 20 or so other users WHO HAVE EXPERIENCED THE SAME THING!? Doesn't it strike you as odd that this is happening to so many others? There is an expert at large in your website, catch him, but don't punish innocent bystanders that have nothing to do with this.

Decline reason:

Further abuse of the unblock template will lead to this page being protected. — John Reaves (talk) 18:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Per http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tramway&diff=126199597&oldid=126002085