User talk:Estalere
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
[edit]Hello! Estalere,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!
|
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 17:57, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but the material you are adding is not suitable for that article. Please take a look at WP:MEDRS for an overview of the sorts of sources that are usable for medical articles on Wikipedia -- MyScienceWorks does not fit the criteria. Note also that Parkinson's disease is a "Featured Article", Wikipedia's highest level of article quality, so we are going to be especially rigorous in maintaining the quality of its sourcing. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 14:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- I've also undone a similar edit at Apitherapy because it's just an animal study. Graham87 02:49, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Bee venom note suitable for a Wikiversity project
[edit]Hi Estalere. I noticed the bee venom note that you wanted to submit to the Parkinson's disease page of Wikipedia. I also understand why, in that form, it was not acceptable. But a few of us have been working on a learning project in the sister project, Wikiversity, and there is no reason why it should not be appropriate for that. See V:Portal:The_Science_Behind_Parkinson's. This will give you an idea about what the project is all about. In particular see V:Progress_and_Prospects_in_Parkinson's_Research and scroll down to where you will see in the table the Main Field of Therapy and the Topic of Neuroprotection. A note on the bee venom work could appropriately be put as a subpage of that. We are keen, however, that references are made to original papers and reviews and so the PLoS One paper should be put in as a reference rather than the MyScienceWork one: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3630120/ . I note that when you go to that PMC web page there are also other relevant references which usefully put this paper in context.
Do let me know what you think of our wikiversity project and whether you can see yourself helping to build it into a valuable and constantly evolving resource. You can write on my Talk page on wikiversity: V:User_talk:Droflet. I'd be happy to help you find your way through this project and get started.
Droflet (talk) 09:01, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of MyScienceWork for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MyScienceWork is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyScienceWork until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 12:33, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- Also, I've left you a note at Talk:List of social networking websites#Edit request on 27 June 2013. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 12:51, 8 July 2013 (UTC)