Jump to content

User talk:Esperanto97

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Edible frog
The edible frog or green frog (Pelophylax kl. esculentus) is a common European frog species that occurs naturally from the northern half of France to western Russia and from Estonia and Denmark to Bulgaria and northern Italy, and is also an introduced species in other parts of the continent. It is a fertile hybrid of the pool frog (Pelophylax lessonae) and the marsh frog (P. ridibundus) and reproduces using hybridogenesis, a process in which one parental genome is excluded. The species is used as food – particularly in France, as well as Germany and Italy – as the delicacy frog legs. This edible frog was photographed in the Danube delta east of Tulcea, Romania.Photograph credit: Charles J. Sharp














You might be interested

[edit]

In reference to this edit summary,[1] and this section[2]...you might be interested in this SPI I created some time ago.[3] Admin RegentsPark and user Kautilya3, who, like me, dealt with the sockmaster in the past, also believe that Kami2018 = Saladin1987. - LouisAragon (talk) 18:49, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@LouisAragon:, if there's any way to stop him from editing and start your investigation all over again (it seems outdated), I'm in. Handful of his edits and relevant contributions are simply awful; they may even qualify as vandalism. --Esperanto97 (talk) 06:38, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you

[edit]
The Commons Barnstar
Thanks for adding historical maps to corresponding articles. They have really enhanced couple of atricles substantially. Keep up the good work! Alterego Wayne (talk) 06:44, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of referenced information, again

[edit]

Dear Esperanto97, being a neutral editor, I invite you to check out the recent contributions by Kami2018, to whom you recently gave a "last warning" on his talk page. He is currently removing refs and reliably sourced content from articles related to the Khalji dynasty. For example, see these edits: [4], [5], [6], [7]. In his edit summary, he claimed that the source he removed was "not credible" (?), although historian Vladimir Minorsky, who is cited, is in fact one of the most trusted academics on the subject. Thanks, Khestwol (talk) 10:35, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Khestwol, I personally does not have any discrepancy with that user; I simply came across his edits at recent changes page where I found out that a handful of his edits were completely disruptive. I guess it's just about time for you (editors who have to deal with him often) to take your cause to ANI and request an indefinite block for him as these well-founded accusations are indeed piling up. Moreover, such users as LouisAragon, Kautilya3, Regentspark suspect him of sockpuppetry claiming that he is the same person with Saladin1987, who was indefinitely site banned years ago for similar behaviour by a unanimous community consensus. You could use their materials on that as well if you like. Good luck! --Esperanto97 (talk) 09:36, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]