User talk:Eschaefer2

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Danielboyd, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you.. This page was previously deleted after a deletion discussion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Boyd. The proper way to contest the deletion would be at Wikipedia:Deletion review. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:29, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I'm a bit confused. Why was the page I created taken down?Eschaefer2 (talk) 18:35, 7 October 2014 (UTC) Erika[reply]

I would like to appeal this page. I have new information that makes this page more credible. Eschaefer2 (talk) 14:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eschaefer2, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Eschaefer2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:37, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Boyd (filmmaker) (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cutest Penguin was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Boyd (filmmaker) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— CutestPenguin^Hangout 18:06, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Boyd (filmmaker) (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Boyd (filmmaker) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:37, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Boyd (filmmaker) has been accepted

Daniel Boyd (filmmaker), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:05, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd originally declined this and you can see the long, long rationale in the article's history, but I ended up cleaning up the article and finding sourcing to show notability. The biggie here is to make sure that everything is sourced by independent and reliable sources like newspapers or academic textbooks. Avoid using hotlinks in the article, as linking to places like Amazon is seen as promotional and in general hotlinks just don't look good on an article and can be seen as promotional. Also, appearing at conventions isn't really something to add to an article because it's generally accepted that anyone in a given profession (especially film) will attend a convention as a guest. The same thing goes for workshop panels. It's just something that goes along with the territory. It can also make the article seem unintentionally promotional. Be careful of self-published sources since the majority of them are unusable. WP:PRIMARY sources like official websites, press releases, and the like are also unusable as sources that can give notability - however you can use a primary source to back up minor detail, although you will need to back the claims up with a non-primary source. I've edited the article down since some of it was unintentionally promotional and I've been adding things in as I find sourcing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:10, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vinh Chung (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vinh Chung and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 18:52, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vinh Chung

Hello, Eschaefer2. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Vinh Chung".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lakun.patra (talk) 12:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]