User talk:Erudecorp

Geomon

No problem - I think I've already fixed the Japanese, so I don't think you need to worry about it. If you want to be extra careful you can preview your changes (click the "show changes" button) before you save an edit: that should show you whether you are about to change more than you expected! By the way, welcome to Wikipedia. --RobertG ♬ talk 11:27, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Icelandic IPA

I have tried to fix the IPA and translations which you have put into some Icelandic articles. Also, note that we usually include this kind of information in the introduction, rather than separating it out. Finally, I removed the photolink you put in the Þjórsá article, it is probably not useful to have a link with only one photo and moreover, I am not convinced that the photo is actually of Þjórsá. Stefán 22:19, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to leave the translations out? Maybe we should leave the IPA out too, and just link to wiktionary. Erudecorp ? * 23:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm sure it is quite common to have IPA in the leads of articles and this is often encouraged. But I'm a little bit on the fence about the translations, for me, Eyjafallajökull means simply the glacier (jökull) at Eyjafjöll. I suppose that if somebody pressed me then I would say that Eyjafjöll means "the island mountains" so I would have to accept that Eyjafjallajökull is "the glacier at the island mountains", but such thorough decompositions may not be very meaningful. Case in point, in the West fjords there is Vatnsdalsvatn, which simply means the lake (vatn) in Vatnsdalur. But what does Vatnsdalur mean? well, it is the valley (dalur) with the lake (vatn), whereas the other valleys in the area don't have big lakes in them. But would we really want to say that Vatnsdalsvatn is "the lake in the valley of the lake" or that it is "the lake in Vatnsdalur". I prefer the latter. Stefán 23:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving Jesus

Just letting you know that I undid your page move archiving of Talk:Jesus. The reason why is because since December 8, 2005 (or archive #20) we have been using the copy and paste archiving technique. When you moved the entire talk page to archive 85, you also moved the page histories of archive 20-85. Therefore, if someone wanted to go through the talk page history to find an original diff for an archived text, they'd need to search through the archive 85 page history. I have instead, moved the page back to Talk:Jesus so that users who ever may want to search the history can more easily find their content (if that makes sense. I feel like I'm not thoroughly explaining this,s o ask questions if necessary). That said, two months ago, I explained who we generally archive pages for Talk:Jesus, and you are welcome to give that a read if you want (see Talk:Jesus/Archive 85#Archiving). Thanks.-Andrew c ^[talk] 15:20, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was gigantic and no one archived it. Thanks for fixing it. Erudecorp ? * 18:50, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Football chant

I notice that you added a huge body of unsourced information to article Football chant on 19 February 2010. (diff) (diff) Is it your intention to add references? Wikispan (talk) 10:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Homophobia

Hey, I've just stumbled upon your question upon the roots to homophobia in history you asked in November last year on the talkpage to homophobia. Tabu Homosexualität might be an interesting source for you, also see its author Gisela Bleibtreu-Ehrenberg and her other main work, Angst und Vorurteil. --79.193.44.74 (talk) 20:13, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Science journalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob McDonald (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Masking (illustration), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Juxtaposition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Carbohydrate digestion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Tissue, Colon, Anaerobic and Villi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Erudecorp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Erudecorp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Password (video gaming), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Erudecorp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Tierra Media" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tierra Media. Since you had some involvement with the Tierra Media redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 18:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Music Works

The article Music Works has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable computer software. Tagged as such for six years. Tagged as unreferenced for the same period. No compelling reason to keep.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 10mmsocket (talk) 20:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]