User talk:Erpert/Archive 10

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Erpert. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 8

→

Eminem's sixth studio album redirect

Thanks a lot. I was wondering why the 3 steps for adding an article we not working. Should've looked for the redirect. Appreciate it bro. Banan14kab (talk) 08:11, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

November 5, 2012

The Justin Jones article is not an autobiography. I am not Justin Jones. I created an article for him because I am a fan of his music. I do not want this article to be deleted. Please suggest what specific changes I should make so that I can ensure this article is not deleted. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JustinJones930 (talk • contribs) 18:07, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
- The article itself seems to be fine, but you should really consider changing your username to avoid any further confusion. Have a good day. :) Erpert ^{Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?} 18:11, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  - I just submitted my username change request. Thank you for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JustinJones930 (talk • contribs) 18:59, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Capri Anderson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Capri Anderson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capri Anderson (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Reply

You take things too personally. When I comment something I don't come to the aid of friends nor I make personal attacks towards enemies. Still, Capri Anderson is notable and her nomination for deletion appears pointy. Cavarrone (talk) 08:33, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- That's your response to a "thank you"? Sheesh, forget I said anything. Erpert ^{Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?} 09:59, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Lexie Grey

Hey, just to let you know that I've restored her full name per this article ;) I've also readded the note in the infobox as IPs tend to write her full name while it's not necessary. Cheers, Sofffie7 (talk) 08:28, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Slutty and Sluttier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Slutty and Sluttier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slutty and Sluttier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David in DC (talk • contribs) 17:15, 20 February 2013‎

Um...why did you notify me about this? I didn't create this article, nor am I a common contributor to it (I might have added a wikilink to it sometime in the past, but that's about it). Erpert ^{Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?} 05:28, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

The creator is banned and you're one of very few to make any significant edits. I was being overcautious. Sorry I cluttered up your page.
Best,
David in DC (talk) 11:32, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

No worries. Erpert ^{Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?} 11:35, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion here you might be interested in. Thank you. Cavarrone (talk) 07:11, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:All Natural Glamour Solos II.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:All Natural Glamour Solos II.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:37, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: John Ham

Hello Erpert. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of John Ham, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Doesn't meet the criteria at {{db-disambig}} as the page doesn't end with (disambiguation). Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 10:33, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I just wanted to remind you that if you nominate a page for deletion (e.g. John Ham), you should let the creator know. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:16, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- WP:CSD doesn't say you have to do that with disambiguation pages. Erpert ^{Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?} 18:48, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Vanilla DeVille edits

While I appreciate your feedback, I do think you were a little heavy handed by deleting 3900 characters indiscriminately because of a couple of items that you think were not cited properly. Many of the changes I made, and you reverted, were corroborated by the original document and sources. Stewiedv (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:28, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alyssa Reece

The article Alyssa Reece has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails PORNBIO, awards/noms scene-related, no nontrivial reliably sourced biographical content

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:59, 21 April 2013 (UTC)