User talk:Erpbridge
Doctor Who companions
[edit]You're making up rules here. See Talk:Companion (Doctor Who)#Future Companions (2) for the discusssion. You are editing repeatedly against consensus without discussion, and that is not constructive. U-Mos (talk) 11:18, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Umos, I am using the same reasoning as has also been used at Iron Chef America by the editor Drmargi regarding the new Iron Chef Garces. According to his edits, WP:CRYSTAL has been invoked as justification to prevent a character or actor from appearing in a Wikipedia article until such time as said character or actor has actually appeared on screen. By that reasoning, the same should apply to any Companion characters that accompany the Eleventh Doctor on the Doctor Who series. The Eleventh Doctor is justified as he has appeared onscreen in "The End of Time part 2", but the character Amy Pond and the actress Karen Gillian has not actually appeared in any actual Doctor Who story on screen, and will not until the new series begins in Spring 2010. Please advise, or please go revert the changes made by editor Dmargi on the Iron Chef America page and provide him the same justification you provided me. Erpbridge (talk) 14:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Valid points, but nevertheless valid points that have been raised before and have a consensus against them. I don't know anything about Iron Chef America so can't comment, but as it's non-fictional perhaps that is a different kettle of fish. At any rate there's WP:OSE to consider. U-Mos (talk) 16:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- I'm going to drop the issue... my comments above still stand as my stance on listing characters/actors/persons who have not been actually aired. I would also include such arguments as the "What if the actress passes away/decides to quit", similar to the issue where Genivieve Bujold dropped out of the role of Kathryn Janeway on Star Trek Voyager after signing a contract and filming a number of scenes. I guess there would be merit since the actress has appeared in pre-production advertisements such as the behind the scenes confidentals, but if those are considered canon and part of the actual events of the show, as opposed to a supplement behind the scenes, is at question. Regardless, I am not going to pursue this any further. I will take your insights on this as definitive, as you are a more experienced editor than myself. No further pursuit of this issue will be heard from me. Erpbridge (talk) 18:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Valid points, but nevertheless valid points that have been raised before and have a consensus against them. I don't know anything about Iron Chef America so can't comment, but as it's non-fictional perhaps that is a different kettle of fish. At any rate there's WP:OSE to consider. U-Mos (talk) 16:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest
[edit]I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
An RfC that you may be interested in...
[edit]As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
- This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Erpbridge. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Erpbridge. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
[edit]Hello Erpbridge! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 20:20, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Erpbridge. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)