User talk:Erisimo

Welcome!

Hello, Erisimo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 17:43, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ermenegildo Zegna (fashion entrepreneur) has been accepted

Ermenegildo Zegna (fashion entrepreneur), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 00:00, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello Erisimo. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Ermenegildo Zegna (fashion entrepreneur), but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Erisimo. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Erisimo|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Matthew hk (talk) 11:32, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jeremy112233. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 11:40, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zegna (brand) has been accepted

Zegna (brand), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DIVINE 16:28, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @DIVINE and thanks a lot for your feedback :)

Even if the article dedicated to Zegna (brand) had been approved and published, we noticed that the entry has been removed and redirected to “Zegna” (as you can see from the Revision history: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Zegna_(brand)&action=history)

User Praxidicae, who removed the article, affirms that in his opinion the entry is promotional and overlaps in content with the Zegna article. However the Zegna entry refers to the whole Ermenegildo Zegna Group, a listed company which includes also other brands such as Thom Browne, Lanificio Zegna, Tessitura di Novara, Dondi, Bonotto.

The publishing of a new article dedicated to Zegna brand, in our opinion, is related to the need of distinguishing the brand, its history and its evolution, from that of the Ermenegildo Zegna Group. In order to better clarify this difference, some weeks ago I asked the community to rename the Zegna article in “Ermenegildo Zegna Group”, but the request was rejected.

Could you please help us restore it or maybe suggest some improvements or reviews that could be implemented to make the entry even more neutral?

Thanks a lot in advance! Erisimo (talk) 11:03, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But i saw that the article is already available on wikipedia as Zegna & Praxidicae redirect it. So, please ask with her or ask for help in WP:TEAHOUSE. DIVINE 19:54, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]