User talk:Erik Warmelink

User page

I did ask to be blocked as User:Erik Warmelink while User:ErikWarmelink (no space) is blocked. However, I did not ask for http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User:Erik_Warmelink&oldid=276329557 to be ~~removed~~ overwritten. Erik Warmelink (talk) 14:23, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A very nice way to remind me that User:Erik Warmelink wasn't removed but overwritten: User:ErikWarmelink and User talk:ErikWarmelink were deleted. Erik Warmelink (talk) 00:32, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Damnatio memoriae seems to be the official policy, the admin who removed my userpage didn't remove it because my userpage was so "bad", but because my userpage was "on a list". (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup). Erik Warmelink (talk) 22:30, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I may not edit user talk:129.125.102.126, but I do edit from that IP address. Erik Warmelink (talk) 18:22, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am somewhat unhappy with these two edits, if the author hadn't accused me of sockpuppetry and wouldn't have incited user:wikifan12345 to tell me that goyim who oppose ethnic cleansing, may rot in camps, I probably wouldn't have been blocked indefinitely. Erik Warmelink (talk) 14:12, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Being blocked is worse than I thought

If you can edit, please undo http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Template:Di-no_license/doc&diff=302611000 Erik Warmelink (talk) 10:49, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

At Tikhon Khrennikov, a not-so-great image is used because there would be no free equivalent, however File:Khrennikov.jpg is free, in colour and somewhat bigger. It might be more about his position at the Union of Soviet Composers than about his work as a composer, but the article is also more about his position at the Union of Soviet Composers. Erik Warmelink (talk) 18:24, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Washington,_Tyne_and_Wear&diff=311927050&oldid=311494273 can't be reverted anymore, but the "Gaelic origin" is still mentioned. --Erik Warmelink (talk) 14:37, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diff 329215998

Re: I'd guess that the number of people affected by blocks is fairly minimal: I would guess the number of people editing is "more minimal". If User:Stephan Schulz can find a reliable source which claims that more than 1000 persons (not nicknames) edit wikipedia. I would be surprised; on the other hand, I do not know 1000 blocked persons either; however, I do personally know more blocked people than unblocked editors (then again, those people may continue to edit using another pseudonym). I am sure there far more people are affected by blocks than people with socks which were promoted to admin. Erik Warmelink (talk) 17:44, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]