User talk:Ericahahnforeverbrookesmith

John Forbs

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article John Forbs, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of John Forbs. Pinkadelica (talk) 06:43, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use images

A number of images which you have uploaded recently fail the first fair use criterion by illustrating a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. Consequently, I have tagged some of these images for deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Zetawoof_(ζ) 01:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove replaceable fair use tags from images, as you did on Image:DianaWilliamslooksflatoutcrazy.jpg. If you believe that a free replacement image cannot be reasonably found or created, please follow the directions given in the template. Zetawoof_(ζ) 02:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Alicia Keys. Thank you. NrDg 05:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Ingo Rademacher. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NrDg 06:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Brookesmithgreysanatomy.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Brookesmithgreysanatomy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]