User talk:Equanimous2

Welcome

Hello, Equanimous2, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 14:56, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE Talk:Sodium fluoride

Hi, you wrote "Does anyone have any evidens that sodium fluoride prevents cavities ??? My own research shows that it more proberly calcium fluoride which prevents cavities." on Talk:Sodium fluoride. I have provided a response there and a longer one here.

Sorry I can't provide you with evidence, perhaps some other user can. But there seems only 3 fluoride compounds are commonly used in commercial tooth paste as a decay retarding compounds. Stannous fluoride SnF2 (Tin fluoride), sodium monofluorophosphate or sodium fluoride. All these fluoride compounds are manufactured from hydrofluoric acid, which commercially is usually manufactured from fluorspar (calcium fluoride). So yes in a manner of speaking, calcium fluoride prevents cavities if you accept that sodium fluoride does.

If you have information that calcium fluoride is a better preventer of cavities than sodium fluoride (and like compounds) it may be worth while if verifiable (see WP:V) to add it to a article like Toothpaste, Dental caries or similar. On a side point it helps other users (to respond or identifying the user who wrote the message) if you sign you posts on talk pages by typing 4 tildes (~~~~) or clicking on the button 3rd from right (the one next to the crossed out W) in the row of buttons above the editing box when you are posting a message. --blue520 15:13, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge suggestion

Is has been proposed that Biochemic Cell Salts be merged with Bioplasma. Please let us hear your opinion. -- Fyslee 15:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TimeLETSystems

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article TimeLETSystems, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 16:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of TimeLETSystems

An editor has nominated TimeLETSystems, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TimeLETSystems and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Publications collaboration

Wikipedia:Publications collaboration, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Publications collaboration and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Publications collaboration during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- RG ² 03:48, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:PUBCOLNOM

Template:PUBCOLNOM has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. -- RG ² 04:03, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Biochemic cell salts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Biochemic cell salts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biochemic cell salts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bobrayner (talk) 10:47, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Democratic hierarchy

The article Democratic hierarchy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cannot find coverage about this term in WP:RS to get it past WP:NEO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vrac (talk) 19:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]