User talk:Episcopal.167

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Episcopal.167, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 19:08, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thank you for your help with Anne B. Jolly. Bearian (talk) 17:15, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kristin Uffelman White (February 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NOTABILITY.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kristin Uffelman White and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Episcopal.167! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Latin names of Episcopal dioceses?[edit]

Hello, Can I ask why you have added a Latin name to the Diocese of Wisconsin page? It's not my understanding that Episcopal Church dioceses have Latin names and that this infobox parameter is designed for Catholic dioceses. Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:02, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dclemens1971! A good chunk of the Wikipedia pages for Episcopal dioceses have Latin names listed (including the three dioceses that just combined to form DioWI), so I added it for consistency. Episcopal.167 (talk) 19:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why they appear that way -- that strikes me as unnecessary. It appears the editor who added them in fall 2023 (@TheFriendlyFas2) was blocked shortly thereafter for disruptive editing. Would you object if I were to remove them? Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would not! (For what it's worth, I find them quite funny/entertaining, but that's not a good enough reason to keep them) Episcopal.167 (talk) 19:32, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Will add it to my maintenance list but glad we could discuss first :) Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:35, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hi Episcopal.167. Thank you for your work on Episcopal Diocese of Wisconsin. Another editor, Pbritti, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Glad this got done so quick.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Pbritti}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pbritti (talk) 14:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]