User talk:EpiVictor

Here you can leave your personal messages and discuss about Wikipedia contents with me... only be gentle and educated :-)

National Mysticism

The reason I considered it POV was that it was just Albanians, and there were many examples on just Albanians. The examples were also not well explained. If you included some other nationalities, and you didn't include so many examples just on Albanians, then they wouldn't be singled out, and it wouldn't be considered POV. Dori | Talk 12:27, May 10, 2004 (UTC)

As I said, it's not just the statements about the Albanians that I am worried about. Even though you are Greek, it doesn't mean that the Greek statements you put in should be demeaning or condescending in any way. As long as the article has a neutral and encyclopedic tone, I am OK with including info on Albanians. The other problem is verifiability. One has to be careful not to include statements that are not widely accepted (i.e. hearsay). Dori | Talk 15:35, May 10, 2004 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Literature Collaboration of the Week

Patrida, I'm rallying up support for Alexandros Papadiamantis in Wikipedia:Literature Collaboration of the Week. So, go vote! :D

Project2501a 16:26, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedians in Greece

Hi, I understand that you are either Greek Wikipedian or a Wikipedian living in/with an interest in Greece.

The category page Wikipedians/Greece has been replaced with Category:Wikipedians in Greece but your name still appears on the old list. You might considering moving it. You might also consider adding adding Template:Greekwiki to your user page.

A Wikipedia:Greek Wikipedians' notice board has been in existence for some time but is terribly underutilised. It would certainly benefit from your involvement.--Damac 12:15, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Aegean crisis" article

Hi, I think you were one of the contributors to Aegean crisis, right? If you're interested, please see my note on the talk page there. Thanks. Lukas 13:37, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mock/sock-puppets

Evcharisto, re pedi. I can't help thinking, though that there's something sad about a person whose idea of fun is pretending to be more than one person and disagreeing with himself... --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 18:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Brickgame.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brickgame.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:35, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for help with Greek politics

Hi. I'm hoping you can help me find a wiki.riteme.site editor who knows something about contemporary Greek politics, mainly whether Wikipedia should list Kyriakos Velopoulos as a White Supremacist. Following some changes by anonymous editors, we now list Mr Velopoulos, Nikolaos Michaloliakos and Kostas Plevris as Contemporary White Supremacists but the term "White Supremacist" has a narrow (and somewhat America-centric) definition which I suspect few if any Greeks would fit into.

(I picked you at random from Category:Wikipedians_in_Greece. I hope you don't mind.)

Cheers, CWC(talk) 15:17, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no problem about picking me up, on the opposite, you may have done the right choice :-). Now...about Mr. Velopoulos: I have had the "luck" of watching several of his long rants at TeleAsty, either supporting some dubious "Greek superiority" theories, or promoting books and magazines (the TV screenshot on the wikipedia article bears the "ΕΛΛΗΝΟΡΑΜΑ" logo, a well-known Greek mystical-nationalist magazine (not only a TV show). About your question: I think the best term to describe Mr. Velopoulos and other similar individuals, is either plain "nationalist" or at most "national-mysticist" or "epsilonist". Some dose of anti-Semitism is perhaps present in the latter two properties, but never have I heard or read anything that could place Mr. Velopoulos into the "White Supremacist" category. As you said, this last term has a much narrower sense and Mr. Velopoulos (currently) doesn't fit in. He may be a nationalist, surely, and even have connections with epsilonism (or historical delusionism, as some people place it), but he surely has little or nothing to do with "White Power"-like organizations. EpiVictor 16:58, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

C64 Colour Clash

FYI, the C64 did suffer from colour clash. However, hardware sprites were not affected by it, and most C64 users seem to be unaware of the limitation. --StuartBrady (Talk) 22:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KZ manager

This article has been semiprotected per your request. It would be nice if you could provide references for it. I have made a note on the article's talk page. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 12:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With a little googling, I found some -I hope- less controversial references, which still describe the gameplay precisely enough, and document the game's existence. This even led to the "discovery" of an Amiga version of the game. Well, not it's time for a video-games tag and maybe image, I guess. EpiVictor 13:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of computer and video games considered the worst ever

Hello EpiVictor,

I am writing you because you are one of the Wikipedians who have editted the List of computer and video games considered the worst ever. However, the way it is being done now, I believe doesn't work. I would like to invite you to take 2 minutes of your time and leave your thoughts on the talk page.

best regards,

JackSparrow Ninja

Vandalism

I recieved this message from you.

"I remind you that repeated unconstructive edits (such as removing the SomethingAwful link from Thundra without discussion or providing a reason) might be considered vandalism. You may -cleverly- try to "distribute" the "workload" between this account and your several sockpuppet IP's so they never get blocked at the same time or "water down" punishments, but how longer do you expect to last doing that? EpiVictor 09:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC)"

The accusation completely confuses me, because I have never once edited aything on Wikipedia. I simply enjoy reading the articles. Although, I believe i can offer an explanation - which is - I am using a dialup internet service, which recycles IP adresses, so some person with the same ISP must have made the edit on that particular IP adress before I got it.

I erased my cache on my internet browser and made sure wikipedia refreshed from scratch. So, hopefully the problem will not show up again.

This is my first time ever writing anything on this website, so if I have done anything completely wrong feel free to fix it or just delete it. Thanks.

That message was targetted to a person vandalising the Thundra article, and the IP tracking I did revealed it was a dial-up dynamic IP from Syracuse, NY, USA, so it could very well be that you live there or use the same service as this guy and you happened to use the same IP once or more. That's the problem with anonymous edits, in general, you never know if the intended person will read the message or if unrelated persons will perhaps be offended. EpiVictor 14:15, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Compact Cassette article

Hi I’m very embarrassed; I was trying to add a paragraph without deleting anything and I don’t know how I managed to knock those sections out. I think I’ve repaired them now. Many apologies Zagubov 21:14, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LIDL Energy Drink.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:LIDL Energy Drink.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Nv8200p talk 02:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:MelGibsonSafari.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:MelGibsonSafari.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that belonged to the Mel Gibson's Safari article, which was deleted twice as non-notable, so the image can go too. EpiVictor 10:48, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CD-MO references

Good catch. All existing MO implementations use spiral tracks, so CD-MO should be no exception (but I couldn't find any sources to back that up). I might be confusing it with the PD format at the time.

I also tried looking up more info about the format on the Net, but most occurrences are just passing references (not surprising considering it probably never existed beyond the initial specification). Even Philips themselves indicated that Orange Book Part 1 had been withdrawn [1], thus probably not available from them anymore. As for its commercial availability, I was able to find sources [2][3] claiming the format was not commodified. —Broccoli 05:39, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Hellenism

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Anti-Hellenism, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Guy Montag 06:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Thundra.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Thundra.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Video games notable for negative reception

I'm trying to generate consensus on which games should be included in the article. Feel free to drop by Talk:Video games notable for negative reception and leave your thoughts on the proposed criteria. Cheers, Lankybugger ○ Yell ○ 01:01, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:122 5.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:122 5.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 00:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coatto

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Coatto, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Until(1 == 2) 15:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User: Kavaliotaki

It seems this user, doesn't care what we say and has decided to revert our edits. What should we do about it? (The user (Kavaliotaki) who says the Turkish names aren't relevant.) ^{El Greco (talk · contribs)} 20:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say report the case to an admin after he breaks the three-revert rule, or request protection for the article (semi protection won't work unless he's newly registered). EpiVictor 08:00, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MythosTeyxos1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MythosTeyxos1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:26, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

D'Antonio David page

Hi EpiVictor, I'm just letting you know I've RFCbio'ed the value of this article. I don't see that this article can be raised to Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons standards, and I don't see the subject warrants a bio page.--Drojem (talk) 07:02, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

D'Antonio David

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article D'Antonio David, because another editor is suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Drojem (talk) 03:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gngenerals.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gngenerals.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Front Line boundary.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Front Line boundary.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Flettner Fl 282 do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Definite copyright issue Mww113 (talk) (Report a mistake!) 19:41, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bravoman cruelty.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Bravoman cruelty.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bravoman phonebox.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Bravoman phonebox.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RevolutionXSNES.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RevolutionXSNES.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bravoman phonebox.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bravoman phonebox.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGa^talk 22:49, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bravoman cruelty.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bravoman cruelty.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGa^talk 22:49, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:DJBoyracist.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DJBoyracist.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:35, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Cyberbykes.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cyberbykes.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:36, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Hardhead1b.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hardhead1b.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:49, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Hardhead1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hardhead1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:56, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:50, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:NES G-BASIC.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NES G-BASIC.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:52, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:KZManager.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:KZManager.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:14, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Epsilon Team for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Epsilon Team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epsilon Team until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Athenean (talk) 00:12, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:SturmtruppenTheGame.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SturmtruppenTheGame.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:58, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cyberbykes

The article Cyberbykes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not covered in any RS that I can find. WP:VG custom search finds no sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, EpiVictor. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mythos (comics)

The article Mythos (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Admittedly searching is difficult due to the incredibly generic title, and the conflict with Mythos (Marvel Comics), but I wasn't able to find any sources indicating notability. There's nothing on the Greek Wikipedia article either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:21, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chronovisor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chronovisor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronovisor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jontesta (talk) 15:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]