User talk:EpéeDeLaProvidence

June 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You knew all edits to Pantheon-Sorbonne University are considered controversial. You know it was protected 3 times in May 2018 due to edit warring.

You were warned multiple times that consensus must be achieved at article talk before any edits are made. You were blocked for it before. Your block expired and the first thing you did was to make edits to that article again with no talk page discussion at all.

I have therefore blocked you indefinitely. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EpéeDeLaProvidence (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Anna Frodesiak is lyinng, as an administrator, he is distastefully dishonest and hostilely partial, apart from being utterly incompetent (the user cannot read French).He lied about me not getting consensus, whereas in fact, I tried everything in my power to talk with the other party and Anna Frodesiak, which you can see ON https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Pantheon-Sorbonne_University#Discussion_about_disputed_April_29_to_May_2,_2018_edits . I was frustrated to be ignore SYSTEMATICALLY. This kind of incompetency, dishonesty and vengeful blocking administrative behavior

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked as we don't tolerate personal attacks here. If you are willing to talk about your actions (not those of other users) and address your edit-warring, you may use WP:UTRS. Yamla (talk) 16:42, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sock account

Sock account: User:F U Admim

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]