User talk:Eosin-Y
Spelling
[edit]I noticed you changed the spellings of metre to meter in one section of the Metric system article. Please note that WP policy on US versus Non-US spellings is that an article should be consistent all the way through and where consensus can't be reached on which one should be used, then the first contributor's style is chosen. This article uses the non-US spellings throughout and so should remain that way. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia and please continue to do so, but please keep in mind this and other WP policies. See Manual of style for all such guidelines. Jim77742 01:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Tease and denial has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Sourcing & notability issues
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer 09:21, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Tease and denial for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tease and denial is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tease and denial until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer 14:07, 15 February 2013 (UTC)