User talk:EnzoGorlomi90
Welcome EnzoGorlomi90!
I'm Sm8900, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
Sincerely, -Sm8900 (talk) 🚀🌍 14:26, 21 April 2021 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
-Sm8900 (talk) 🚀🌍 14:26, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
April 2021
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Death of Benito Mussolini shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DeCausa (talk) 08:28, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- I understand, but please, instead of going around reversing my edit, fix it. It is very simple, and I got the source from Wikipedia in Spanish but I don't know how to put it right in Wikipedia in English. I will not start any edition war, since I know the consequences that it entails, but I only ask that of you; correct what I do instead of erasing because in any way or another you are vandalizing.--EnzoGorlomi90 (talk) 15:43, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Youy’ve just restored your edits. That means you’ve reverted Jonesey95 for the third time as well as reverting my revert. See WP:ONUS. There’s multiple problems in what you are trying to do. I’ve opened a thread on the article talk page and we can discuss it there. Don’t revert agin - the onus is on you to gain WP:CONSENSUS for your edits. DeCausa (talk) 15:59, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- I thought you had removed the section on how Hitler found out about Mussolini's execution but I had to restore my edition, which obviously has its sources but which you don't want to see. You and that other busybody Jonesey95 destroy in a second what one takes to do in hours. You are intelligent and civilized, so think carefully about what you do.--EnzoGorlomi90 (talk) 16:04, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nothing is destroyed. It’s all still there that can restored once you have consensus. But there are too many problems with what you are trying to do. DeCausa (talk) 16:15, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- What are these problems according to you?--EnzoGorlomi90 (talk) 16:19, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- I’ve mentioned them on the article talk page. And by the way, stop telling other editors to clean up your mistakes as you did on Jonesey95’s talk page and as you’ve done to me. That’s not the way it works on Wikipedia. If you add poor quality material as you have done and you can’t be bothered to fix it then you’ll just be reverted. And if you keep on restoring it you’ll get blocked. DeCausa (talk) 16:41, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- My mistakes? He who is not capable of fixing but of vandalizing, does he go on to say that I place poor sources? Be careful with his words, because the last thing you said to me sounds like a threat and the blocked one may be you.--EnzoGorlomi90 (talk) 17:09, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Of course it’s a threat. It’s a threat based on Wikipedia policy: that if you don’t follow it you’ll get blocked. i suggest you study WP:OR and WP:V before you edit any further on en.wp. DeCausa (talk) 17:31, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Leave me alone.I realize that you are not nice at all.--EnzoGorlomi90 (talk) 18:44, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Of course it’s a threat. It’s a threat based on Wikipedia policy: that if you don’t follow it you’ll get blocked. i suggest you study WP:OR and WP:V before you edit any further on en.wp. DeCausa (talk) 17:31, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- My mistakes? He who is not capable of fixing but of vandalizing, does he go on to say that I place poor sources? Be careful with his words, because the last thing you said to me sounds like a threat and the blocked one may be you.--EnzoGorlomi90 (talk) 17:09, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- I’ve mentioned them on the article talk page. And by the way, stop telling other editors to clean up your mistakes as you did on Jonesey95’s talk page and as you’ve done to me. That’s not the way it works on Wikipedia. If you add poor quality material as you have done and you can’t be bothered to fix it then you’ll just be reverted. And if you keep on restoring it you’ll get blocked. DeCausa (talk) 16:41, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- What are these problems according to you?--EnzoGorlomi90 (talk) 16:19, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nothing is destroyed. It’s all still there that can restored once you have consensus. But there are too many problems with what you are trying to do. DeCausa (talk) 16:15, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- I thought you had removed the section on how Hitler found out about Mussolini's execution but I had to restore my edition, which obviously has its sources but which you don't want to see. You and that other busybody Jonesey95 destroy in a second what one takes to do in hours. You are intelligent and civilized, so think carefully about what you do.--EnzoGorlomi90 (talk) 16:04, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
EnzoGorlomi90 I have already answered your "Help Me" request on another user's page. Seriously, I urge you to engage in dialog at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. Wikipedia guidelines on sourcing and content can be confusing to a new user. My own edits were reverted multiple times when I first started editing. Really ticked me off, but in hindsight, those reverts of my edits were not wrong. Wikipedia can sometimes be hard to understand in how things have to be worded and sourced. Rather than butting heads with other editors over who is right and who is wrong, I suggest you post at the Military History project. If you don't understand their first explanation, then ask for more guidance. Rationally asking for help at that project is a heck of a lot better alternative than getting blocked. Please give that project talk page a try. — Maile (talk) 18:37, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Pura sangre
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Please note that disambiguation pages like Pura sangre are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:
- Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
- Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
- Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
- Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
- Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
- Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory
Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 13:30, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit] | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Tornatore2007 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:52, 20 November 2021 (UTC) |
Unblock
[edit]
EnzoGorlomi90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This ridiculous Ninja (must be named Niña) don't have any proof that I'm this Tornatore. By this reason I'm not this Tornatore. My edits are very different of this guy Tornatore and I don't know why or what make think that I'm this guy. Please unblock me. This is unfair and ridiculous. I'm not Tornatore.--EnzoGorlomi90 (talk) 16:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Schoolyard insults directed at the blocking admin's username are not the way to get unblocked — Daniel Case (talk) 07:07, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
EnzoGorlomi90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The point is that I am not that blocked user. My editions are not alike in anything and even more; reviewing the editions of Tornatore, that only made a single and for that reason they blocked it. I had already read about Gilles de Rais before and after investigating the history from my IP, because I did not want to connect due to a misunderstanding with Wikipedia in Spanish. That is what happened and in short it is not a reason to block me. Greetings.--EnzoGorlomi90 (talk) 02:33, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
[1] [2] [3] - There is a definite shared interest in Stanley Kubrick and his works among you and your sockpuppets as seen in my diffs provided. That and the same combative attitude, combined with the technical connection, leaves little room for doubt. Sro23 (talk) 01:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.