User talk:Enverpasatr
December 2021
[edit]
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Mount Ararat. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. - Kevo327 (talk) 19:37, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Although Mount Ararat is a Turkish mountain, it is nothing but a provocation to make it look like an Armenian mountain.I will fix this provocation when the page protection is removed. You're starting to be funny now.
Enverpasatr (talk) 19:39, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Notice
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
I am not in any way a supporter of the Azerbaijan-Armenia conflict.The subject is about trying to show a mountain that belongs to Turkey as belonging to Armenia. It is a situation where a photograph of a mountain belonging to Turkey taken from another country is made the main photograph and Turkish names are not written or completely thrown into the background. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Mount_AraratEnverpasatr (talk) 03:56, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
ANI topic
[edit]A topic at the administrator's noticeboard about you has been opened, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#EnverPasaTr. Please respond there.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:50, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Further to that discussion: I note you say your username is your actual name, but it is an unlikely coincidence that you happen to be named after a Turkish nationalist leader with a history of involvement in Armenia, and all your edits to date present a Turkish nationalist viewpoint in relation to a controversial issue involving Armenia. As mentioned at the ANI discussion there is a very real likelihood this account will be blocked as not here to build an encyclopedia. As a suggestion, can you please comment at the ANI before resuming editing anywhere else. -- Euryalus (talk) 09:21, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
December 2021
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 13:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)(talk) Can you tell me why you blocked me?
I want to know why a mountain within the borders of Turkey is shown with a photo taken from Armenia. Doesn't this undermine the impartiality of wikipedia? The reason why this article is tried to be presented in this way is the claims of the Armenians on Mount Ararat.
Why do you want the mountain of Ararat to be published with the impression that it belongs only to Armenia?
Enverpasatr (talk) 13:46, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Enverpasatr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I want the photo of a mountain claimed by the Armenians but belonging to Turkey to be corrected. If you read the article, they say that you should actually have them. and they arrange the page as if it belongs to armenia. It is not possible to enter information for Turks in any way. Are you pushing me away for saying this? My aim is to enter encyclopedic information for this mountain in Turkey. but by blocking me you have an article prepared only by armenians.
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:59, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Enverpasatr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Another moderator who is more knowledgeable than the moderator who blocked me noticed the situation in the article and started making the edits I wanted.I thank him for seeing that the article was not unbiased and correcting it. I blame you for blocking me unnecessarily.
Decline reason:
Not an unblock request. Also see WP:NOTTHEM. 331dot (talk) 14:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.