User talk:EntirelyTrue
Welcome!
|
Speedy deletion nomination of The Huang Trap
[edit]Hello EntirelyTrue,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Huang Trap for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 04:26, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
EntirelyTrue, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]![]() |
Hi EntirelyTrue! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Tirelessly Working Contributor
[edit]![]() |
EntirelyTrue is awarded with the TWC award |
Congratulations. ThanksMachine (talk) 21:55, 25 December 2013 (UTC) |
Possible Vandalism
[edit]Hi. I noticed you reverted my edit on Abuse of notation as "possible vandalism". It was not vandalism. I was removing an unsourced statement which has been tagged as possibly original research for four months, and which is at best poorly explained and at worst simply incorrect. Mr. Granger (talk) 22:30, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Re: revert to vanished user
[edit]That wasn't vandalism, I was blanking the talk page of a user who was renamed as part of Right to Vanish. Andrevan@ 22:57, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd.
[edit]Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. took the "of" out of its name! Historically, it was "of" and now it isn't. I found it out a few minutes after creating the Imperial Tobacco of Canada Ltd. article. (Shemp Howard, Jr. (talk) 00:03, 26 December 2013 (UTC))
Barnstar
[edit]Hi there, I just came across a welcome message that include a barnstar just for joining wikipedia. I think it is a nice gesture but perhaps it does not meet the intended use and that it may encourage over-use as per barnstars. What do you think? Flat Out let's discuss it 10:36, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- As stated in my message, it should not encourage the over-use of barnstars, but to encourage them to edit with quality. You know, many people strive better with a little bit of head-start as well as encouragement. ;) EntirelyTrue (talk) 10:35, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
About redlinks
[edit]"Redlinked. Hence it shouldn't be linked." who said you that? Take a look at Wikipedia:Red link, redlinks are often useful. My best, Cavarrone 10:52, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Stop_x_nuvola.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:32, 26 December 2013 (UTC) ![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
EntirelyTrue (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is my only account. I have also been reverting/undoing edits which I think or know are vandalism.
Decline reason:
The evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/AsIGooglePackupYaBagsInUrOldSkin/Archive makes it pretty clear that this is not your first/only account. only (talk) 09:21, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.