User talk:Endimion17

Image copyright problem with Image:WRM_enc1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WRM_enc1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Girl from Tomorrow

Hi, Thanks for the extra info added to this page.

--NeilEvans 12:48, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images

I have deleted Image:WRM enc1.jpg and Image:WRM enc2.jpg, images scanned from an unknown encyclopedia (about the Warsaw radio mast). I think the images were copyrighted, but not allowed for any purpose as your licence suggested.--Commander Keane 01:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, the images can be undeleted if they turn out to be ok.

Is the image free? We don't know so we can't use it in Wikipedia.

Could the image be used under Wikipedia:Fair use? Well, it is a copy of an encyclopedia - limiting their ability to sell that encyclopedia so it is unlikely.

Placing {{copyrightedFreeUse}} was an error (either a lie or mistake or whatever).--Commander Keane 02:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warsaw Radio Mast images

I marked the following for deletion as I think they're a copyright violation, there's no proof that the website owner released the rights. You can't assume what's the license if it's not explicitly named on the page.

--Wanted 19:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NO2 absurdity

Your comments about common sensical description of NO₂ were welcome to me, although your personal experiences with this material are however not admissable, of course. Unfortunately, Wikipedia-chemistry is significantly influenced by zealots and the ability to Google supporting literature that "makes" their case.--Smokefoot (talk) 17:14, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Magnetobiology

Hello, you left some words like 'pseudoscience' discussing magnetobiology. I'm 30 years in this area, and that's why I wrote this article. I am interested to know your reasons to doubt in the quality of the article or the field. Thanks. VNB (talk) 20:21, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Hirsch funnel.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hirsch funnel.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]