User talk:EndAll6969

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of CaptainHog (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

August 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at WVBB, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Neutralhomer • Talk • 07:07 on August 1, 2016 (UTC) 07:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CaptainHog. Thank you. Neutralhomer • Talk • 07:07 on August 1, 2016 (UTC) 07:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — Diannaa (talk) 13:50, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EndAll6969 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Chill out for a sec, mate. Me thinks that you guys are just a little too paranoid just because someone just touches one single page. I suggest stepping away from the computer/cell phone/tablet for a little bit, go outside, and get some fresh air. You'll probably feel better afterwards. EndAll6969 (talk) 21:23, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Huon (talk) 22:51, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EndAll6969 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

C'mon guys. This isn't funny anymore. I'm trying my hardest, as well as making some improvements, and you know it. EndAll6969 (talk) 22:56, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are deliberately wasting our time. Yamla (talk) 23:03, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Niggas, please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EndAll6969 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been thinking. Do you guys actually LOOK at the edits I made or do you just look at who edited the page and not the edit itself and assume it's me just putting swears on the page or something? I've even left edit summaries and cited my sources. I don't think you actually look at what I've done and just blocked me blindly. You may think I'm "vandalizing" these pages when, in reality, I'm trying my very best. EndAll6969 (talk) 23:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Declining. (non-admin closure) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:22, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EndAll6969 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This isn't funny anymore. Don't you guys have anything better to do than finger yourselves to the fact that pushing around the little guy without giving him a fair trial? EndAll6969 (talk) 23:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Request an unblock on your original account. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:42, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:42, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]