Jump to content

User talk:EndAll6969

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2016

[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at WVBB, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NeutralhomerTalk • 07:07 on August 1, 2016 (UTC) 07:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CaptainHog. Thank you. NeutralhomerTalk • 07:07 on August 1, 2016 (UTC) 07:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EndAll6969 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Chill out for a sec, mate. Me thinks that you guys are just a little too paranoid just because someone just touches one single page. I suggest stepping away from the computer/cell phone/tablet for a little bit, go outside, and get some fresh air. You'll probably feel better afterwards. EndAll6969 (talk) 21:23, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Huon (talk) 22:51, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EndAll6969 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

C'mon guys. This isn't funny anymore. I'm trying my hardest, as well as making some improvements, and you know it. EndAll6969 (talk) 22:56, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are deliberately wasting our time. Yamla (talk) 23:03, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Niggas, please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EndAll6969 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I've been thinking. Do you guys actually LOOK at the edits I made or do you just look at who edited the page and not the edit itself and assume it's me just putting swears on the page or something? I've even left edit summaries and cited my sources. I don't think you actually look at what I've done and just blocked me blindly. You may think I'm "vandalizing" these pages when, in reality, I'm trying my very best. EndAll6969 (talk) 23:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EndAll6969 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This isn't funny anymore. Don't you guys have anything better to do than finger yourselves to the fact that pushing around the little guy without giving him a fair trial? EndAll6969 (talk) 23:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Request an unblock on your original account. ~ Rob13Talk 23:42, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 ~ Rob13Talk 23:42, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]