User talk:Encyclopedia Of Knowledge101

Box office figures of Thangalaan - please do not remove references and figures

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to [1]. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. The box office of Thangalaan had been updated many times with recent numbers as 100+ crore. Yet, your account only has edits of this page, of which many update the box office value to the old figures with an apparant aim to slander the page 74.65.208.102 (talk) 01:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at [2], you may be blocked from editing. Many users have updated the box office of the film to be 100 crores, despite your non-stop change back to the second week collection of 68 crores. It has been a month already, accept the current box office figures and stop disrespecting the talk page sections about the new box office figures. 笑い男~enwiki A Zen drifter has no attachments to anything, even human. Or does he? 00:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK. User:笑い男~enwiki, the user was NOT guilty of vandalism, so let's stop that right now. Second, you reverted the edit without even bothering to explain: please don't do that again. Now, Encyclopedia, I was about to revert you, saying this: a. what's in the lead should be a summary of what's in the article, and it's not in the article. b. You did not do the citation correctly; please figure out how to do those things properly, by reading WP:CITE. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How is reporting second week of box office as the current one not vandalism? Please explain, a lot of the users on the talk page are not convinced too. And how is adding a link [3] where Thangalaan does not exist, not against neutrality? A dubious user such as this who only edits Thangalaan page is legist suspect and cannot be supported without reason. 笑い男~enwiki A Zen drifter has no attachments to anything, even human. Or does he? 01:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because it doesn't meet what is found in WP:VANDAL, simple. It's not vandalism just because you don't like it or because it's not well done. Drmies (talk) 01:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The link in question is a list of biggest box-office bombs, which at least reported a 100$ million in loss. Thanglaan's entire budget is not close to that. Linking that page just above Plot section, as in this version [4], is a clear sign of a vested interest engaging in subtle vandalism (adding misinformation).

The vandal page mentions this as " ...including adding plausible misinformation to articles (such as minor alteration of facts or additions of plausible-sounding hoaxes),..." Thank you for linking that, the user's intention was to give a false image that Thangalaan was one of the biggest failures in history through placing this link [5] in the page. 笑い男~enwiki A Zen drifter has no attachments to anything, even human. Or does he? 01:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, now we have something that we can call vandalism. Fortunately, I suppose, it's not the only one. Encyclopedia, in this edit the numbers you put in the text also don't correspond with the source, and that's enough to stop you from continuing to disrupt the article. Drmies (talk) 02:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 02:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Encyclopedia Of Knowledge101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why did i get blocked??I always provided links to my edits..For nearly a month there were lot of people tried to vandalise this page(Thangalaan) (manipulating collections without links) and I tried to keep them in check..I always provided links to my edits..Just cuz the fan boys of that particular actor thinks this movie is not a flop it doesnt mean so..For nearly a month they were giving exaggerated collections and manipulating facts..I am here to build wikipedia not to ruin it.. What did I do wrong?I gave links of pinkvilla.com which is the biggest box office tracking website in india..

Decline reason:

Please review WP:NOTTHEM and make a new appeal that follows those guidelines. Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Encyclopedia Of Knowledge101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was unceremoniously blocked for no reason,I often provided links to my edits and yet I got blocked..Please look into it.. Encyclopedia Of Knowledge101 (talk) 21:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 08:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please Unblock Me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Encyclopedia Of Knowledge101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I guess now I know why I was blocked.. The block is no longer necessary because now I understand what I have been blocked for,and I will not continue to cause damage or disruption,and will make useful contributions instead.I love wikipedia and I am here to build encyclopedia lets share knowlege,thank you

Decline reason:

This unblock request demonstrates you are deliberately wasting our time. You'll likely only get one more unblock request before you lose access to this talk page so make it count. Yamla (talk) 19:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.