User talk:Emjaelo

This is Emjaelo's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emjaelo (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Apple Music cannot be used as a source to prove notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emjaelo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 12:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Emjaelo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 12:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Draft:Emjaelo. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Qcne (talk) 12:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Emjaelo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Emjaelo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 14:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emjaelo (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Wikishovel were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emjaelo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 09:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Emjaelo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Emjaelo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 12:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

You appear to have a close connection to a subject about which you have written on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 14:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Emjaelo/sandbox moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Emjaelo/sandbox. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 17:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Emjaelo moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Emjaelo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and and this seems like you may be promoting yourself. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 17:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emjaelo/sandbox (May 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emjaelo/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Emjaelo/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Emjaelo/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Emjaelo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Emjaelo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Replace the words "Your reason here" with a statement of why unblocking your account will benefit Wikipedia. JBW (talk) 09:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Appeal Request

I made a mistake while writing and editing my article. I regret my actions. Please review and consider my appeal. Emjaelo (talk) 14:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Emjaelo, please format your appeal by using the template above. Qcne (talk) 14:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #88613, UTRS appeal #88826, & UTRS appeal #88916 have all been declined, each time with instructions to make any future unblock request here, not on UTRS. JBW (talk) 09:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Emjaelo (Block) Appeal Request

Hello. I am the person who made the Emjaelo draft you rejected. This is my first time trying to make an article and I am struggling in trying to make it notable. The sources I used have been used on other accepted Wikipedia articles and I don't know exactly how many roles I should source. I am aware that some topics don't need to have a wikipedia article, but in comparison to other voice actor's articles what is mine missing? I'm also aware that if a topic doesn't have notable sources, it doesn't deserve to be a wikipedia page. If you could, could I have advice for what to do next time? And is it possible to rewrite about Emjaelo again at a different time if I include better and more notable references?

Emjaelo (talk) 09:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) You have been repeatedly advised to post a correctly-formatted appeal, and yet for some reason you insist on doing anything but. No one will see this message, unless your talk page happens to be on their watch list for some reason. Only by posting an actual appeal, using the template provided above, will your appeal appear on the administrators' feed, causing someone to come and respond to it.

I should also add that you need to have an actual reason to be unblocked, and simply wanting to continue your self-promotion campaign isn't it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Thank you Emjaelo (talk) 09:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Emjaelo (Block) Appeal Request

Hello. I am writing to make an appeal concerning my blocked wikipedia account. This is my first time trying to make an article and I am struggling in trying to make it notable. I made a mistake not observing that my article wasn't corresponding with the guidelines which i deeply regret. If i could be given a chance again, to include better and more preferred article? Emjaelo (talk) 16:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal Request for Wikipedia Account Emjaelo

Dear Wikipedia Community,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to appeal the block/restriction on my Wikipedia account, Emjaelo, which was imposed on 10th May, 2024/27th May, 2024. I believe there has been a misunderstanding, and I would like to present my case for reconsideration. I understand that my account was blocked because it was promotional/advertising also due to a violation of Wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view in editing controversial topics. The edit that led to the block was made in good faith, but I now realize it did not align perfectly with Wikipedia's guidelines. I misunderstood the specific requirements regarding neutrality in controversial subjects and have since familiarized myself thoroughly with the relevant policies. Since the block, I have actively engaged in studying Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines, particularly focusing on neutrality, verifiability, and reliable sourcing. The block has prevented me from contributing to articles and discussions that I am passionate about, which has been a setback for my personal growth as a Wikipedia editor. I am eager to resume contributing positively to the community. Based on my understanding of the policies, my commitment to compliance, and my past positive contributions to Wikipedia, I respectfully request that the block on my account be lifted. I believe the initial block was a result of a learning experience, and I am confident in my ability to contribute constructively in the future. Thank you for considering my appeal. I look forward to your response and the opportunity to continue contributing to Wikipedia’s mission of providing reliable information to the public.

Sincerely, Emjaelo Emjaelo (talk) 15:57, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]