Jump to content

User talk:Emilyboda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The idea of the Wikipedia is that we write texts rather than links to existing texts.Drexel's co-op system was one of the first systems[1] of it's kind and is one of Drexel University's major draws for students. - what does it mean? Xx236 (talk) 11:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles[edit]

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Since all of your edits seem to be about or promote Drexel University, I wonder if you might be employed to market the university in some way. If so, you might want to look at this, an automated text on editing if you have a conflict of interest. All the best, any questions just let me know and I'll try to help. Blythwood (talk) 17:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Emilyboda. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Drexel University, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
  • instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of The Drexel co-op system[edit]

The article The Drexel co-op system has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While a worthy-sounding project, not a notable topic for an article in itself. Also massively undue size. This content should be on the university's website; it might be worth mentioning it in a section on the university's article, but it doesn't feel right for a whole article. Fails WP:BRANCH, WP:NOTHOWTO and WP:ORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blythwood (talk) 17:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Emilyboda, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Emilyboda! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

18:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of The Drexel co-op system for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Drexel co-op system is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Drexel co-op system until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blythwood (talk) 00:22, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]