User talk:Emily Pain at Dirty Records

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Speedy deletion of User:Emily Pain at Dirty Records

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The page User:Emily Pain at Dirty Records has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 09:54, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello Emily Pain at Dirty Records. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Emily Pain at Dirty Records. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Emily Pain at Dirty Records|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 09:54, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being compensated by anyone for my edits. Emily Pain at Dirty Records (talk) 09:56, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you employed by Dirty Records? If not, what is your association with them? I assume that Mr. Michaelides has asked you to write about him? What I told him goes for you too- articles are typically written by independent editors wholly unconnected with the subject, and they must primarily summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the musician("artist"), showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable musician. Promotional activity (which has a broader meaning here) is not permitted on Wikipedia. If you intend to contribute about either yourself or artists on your label, you must first read about conflict of interest and paid editing; declaring paid editing is a Terms of Use requirement and mandatory. You should generally not directly edit about topics for which you have a conflict of interest, but instead you may submit draft articles via Articles for Creation, and propose edits to existing articles through formal edit requests(click for instructions) on article talk pages. 331dot (talk) 09:58, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vassilis Michaelides (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vassilis Michaelides and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:02, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Emily Pain at Dirty Records! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 10:02, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vassilis Michaelides

Hello, Emily Pain at Dirty Records. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vassilis Michaelides, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vassilis Michaelides

Hello, Emily Pain at Dirty Records. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Vassilis Michaelides".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 10:16, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]