User talk:Emihunty

1933

Exactly what is the significance of 1933 for the map on the IFS article? A 1922 map is more appropriate. Murry1975 (talk) 09:43, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But 1933 has no context on the article, the current map on it I agree is small, but it has context. Why, in your opinion, is 1933 more appropriate? Murry1975 (talk) 10:57, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]