User talk:Emailtolucky10

March 2024

Hello, I'm Cahk. An edit that you recently made to Chuhra seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Cahk (talk) 10:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chuhra, you may be blocked from editing. SG5536B (my talk page | my contribs) 10:28, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the mazhabi sikhs actually belongs to churamani which is also written as chura elsewhere, churamani is actually a sanskrit word which means 'the diamond above all' and the same word is used for 'the sun' and 'APOLLO' in olden days. The Mazhabi sikhs/Rangrette/Rajput sikhs with the origin of Rajput that is why the RAJPUT REGIMENTAL CENTRE is kept along with the the SIKH LIGHT INFANTRY REGIMENTAL CENTRE at FATEHGARH DISTT FARRUKHABAD, UP.

THE ERSTWHILE SIKH PIONEERS REGIMENT ACTUALLY BELONGS TO MAHARAJA FARIDKOT OF UNDIVIDED PUNJAB WHO WAS WELL KNOWN AS 'BANS BAHADUR BRAR'AND THE Mazhabi sikhs are called as BANS BAHADUR Emailtolucky10 (talk) 13:46, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sikh Light Infantry. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 12:33, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sikh Light Infantry. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 21:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Don't SHOUT

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Emailtolucky10/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Emailtolucky10! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 21:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Emailtolucky10/sandbox

Hello, Emailtolucky10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Emailtolucky10/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]